IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] tickets or sesssions or both (oh my)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 04 September 2014 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4811A892B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.044
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4VMY0zWjqHn for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF971A8905 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137262005D00A for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=v0FqIGmX/u5zdnaGY976 drrQVGk=; b=h+TDSIEBhDbMAKM0pt2FzEOgd6zWeuBfIjVNIPmO2NhL1zjTbRDx G48CUX+Fhf/pM/1yy0CU5FbSL/JZwPBLY2ZBfz41CPbWvihGmH80Y0AfkHteRI91 6G5B4b83eNsWnm5UwIQML4Q9yCgpI+Uyib7gcyOeZSKqi16F8N3lNt8=
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA9642005D008 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z2so1350929wiv.15 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.13.20 with SMTP id d20mr6991547wic.28.1409844735396; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.231.131 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgwwQdJvqKaqyjJDV7CimA8JCHUwbT9V2bQMgZu6jLJyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D1204BE08@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAK3OfOhi77M0N1syUq+hiaXncE9kC5E+v_ri1dgvsVkA3XkYsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgwwQdJvqKaqyjJDV7CimA8JCHUwbT9V2bQMgZu6jLJyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:32:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOjAX8Qr9waq=xOGkGj4skB_2-4MoPfw5CW65G6pU=qkSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/MqGvRuwlrZ27-YUmXYtegipXHs4
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] tickets or sesssions or both (oh my)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:32:18 -0000

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
<ietf@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> The argument that some people can't write code is never a good reason
> to cripple implementations.

Indeed, and if we take it to the limit it's an argument for giving up
(and certainly for abandoning TLS).

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status