IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557B812783A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q19pfIHZXuyA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 09:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2478128E19 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 09:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v43GF4Ob014777 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:15:22 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=loQ0yDINLsRlgLN7rWVozPMkcML8ZUOFfKC8QCv6xWc=; b=EPMKFxF6U05vl2ullBNQsJ610ZSkyLc01BQ0rv1qzmOLPJ7Hce+YwjECiQAWOFOM3xk2 VudRU9vKYEOFXZIRaVJ0NMfkNGcdtKob2qJ51oJ1+DQtp/m1WJzS8gTx5aC9sm8xjZkE GhVJSfbWhKJr/xwCITVb72HoVjV72tGc+UYZagFT3ty2o3aFVVxiFJiI23YX3RveBzOV 13nxbWrcg63Ws7IbGRQ37ySzBRMvBXMdbXwylZsxrOZ1oTIY8EM4Xi9jxsXTjc8cZ2xJ wy5acn0qHhl4onyrNSGoDqA/or2x4OEeqcwed4TutWIB4Fvahy3QmfhKj2DABty/VTMa Rw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 ([96.6.114.86]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2a72pcm192-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 May 2017 17:15:21 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v43G4NCE014814 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 12:15:15 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2a72mb20y1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 May 2017 12:15:15 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:15:14 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:15:14 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT
Thread-Index: AQHSw1NICDv1l4S8FUWU9Zh5nPuktKHiqKmAgAA6vACAAAYlAIAAJaUAgAAJboD//62gwIAAVmoA//+tbDA=
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 16:15:14 +0000
Message-ID: <7e8cdee4abfb43b692efe2f570059bfb@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAAF6GDcKZj9F-eKAeVj0Uw4aX_EgQ4DuJczL4=fsaFyG9Yjcgw@mail.gmail.com> <cb518e35-c214-d11d-a068-c454b2e7ea6a@gmx.net> <CAAF6GDfQ+YXV4gvhBOOZKC=wtYhxQUy1_2_M+dgfbdL25pppiQ@mail.gmail.com> <BCD73E79-0675-4B71-92B4-3226F0BAB597@dukhovni.org> <CAAF6GDdpq8DgLx5Fo6apoTHgwQsbdn6hb=ozi1+JP9VMxPw6sA@mail.gmail.com> <539D071B-7DDD-4820-A9E4-EC178400B7B2@dukhovni.org> <420471d6016a41ecbcdf9562be303f62@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <17414FC2-15BB-4A03-8673-7F8299E5428E@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <17414FC2-15BB-4A03-8673-7F8299E5428E@dukhovni.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.36.217]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-03_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705030294
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-03_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705030297
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NGnYNEcTGckh-a8f-mqEQtpL-h4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 16:17:25 -0000

> No, that responsibility falls on libraries.  STEKs are not a trap for the unweary.

Unweary :)  Funny.

We disagree.  And I think the concerns Colm has raised show that others are also in agreement.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email