Re: [TLS] 0-RTT and Anti-Replay

Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de> Mon, 23 March 2015 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <roland@zinks.de>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD68C1ACD33 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7TVteasbbuRm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEFB1ACC8C for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1427128595; l=513; s=domk; d=zinks.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date; bh=Vc3jIJStC9D8f6mzlqgUE1lWxhIvTiZKv5BYRwsO0Yk=; b=OjbvgctmuiKEjXqfNIav8ScQDP9lsmm+xUFRokqx/cARsyPkhhBowdLbYm/ihZkh7S1 sQ9iTLjt6CqsODXN6qBh702n6IYmdragZ0fPHOtrN9GTrvmUwUyUmi9Ye2D45vfI/ij3s I/HDQdgTY5RLTH2pbBTQMngLJPIrt7btDtI=
X-RZG-AUTH: :PmMIdE6sW+WWP9q/oR3Lt+I+9KAK33vRJaCwLQNJU2mlIkBC0t1G+0bSVECAiLzTv5UXpfUT3myN2hlbG+UDaVCoSA==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from [IPv6:2001:4dd0:ff67:0:b430:a134:91bc:ebfa] ([2001:4dd0:ff67:0:b430:a134:91bc:ebfa]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.4 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id d07d4br2NGaZ85x (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256)) (Client did not present a certificate) for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:36:35 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <55104114.5060903@zinks.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:36:36 +0100
From: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <CABcZeBP9LaGhDVETsJeecnAtSPUj=Kv37rb_2esDi3YaGk9b4w@mail.gmail.com> <550F6582.9040602@brainhub.org> <CABcZeBNn92Zu7Hfu5z8qD=AZDn=jUkZ3phk18G7S1z7XJNQ9sQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWXtpuSKH-eEou9O7qncUSeuiv=4kw_GE6Um8VW3dcohQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150323083308.GL21267@localhost> <20150323144052.GF9387@mournblade.imrryr.org> <55102E3A.70300@zinks.de> <20150323152831.GG9387@mournblade.imrryr.org> <55103A6E.4060409@zinks.de> <20150323162200.GI9387@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150323162200.GI9387@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NIyjIzwOIIuzHbQlY3wfqkgElJ0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 0-RTT and Anti-Replay
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:36:43 -0000

On 23.03.2015 17:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> They lose.
>
>      * If clients make 0-RTT requests to a stack that does not
>      support these, all connection abort when the stack requests
>      non-expedited data, while expedited data is pending.
>
>      * If the stack requests expedited data without an explicit
>      request from the server application to do that, it is broken.
>      Vulnerability reports will be filed, everyone will run around
>      patching, ...
>
Hope you will not get many such vulnerability reports.