Re: [TLS] OCSP must staple

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 04/06/14 01:39, Sean Turner wrote:
> I believe that draft has been abandoned in favor of:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hallambaker-tlsfeature/
> 
> Personally, I don’t think this draft is applicable to the TLS WG and
> would be better suited as an AD sponsored draft.  I know PHB
> approached me about sponsoring it but I think we both got busy before
> the end of my term.  I’ve not doubt PHB will at some point approach
> Stephen/Kathleen about sponsoring it.  If you’re interested in
> supporting it, sending them a message might help
> ([e-mail]).

I did discuss AD sponsoring this with Phill and am fine with
that plan since there is (I believe) support for implementing
it in some browsers.

So Phill - please tell me when you think this is ready and
if possible recruit a document shepherd if you've not already.

S.


> 
> spt
> 
> On May 28, 2014, at 15:00, Jeremy Rowley <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> 
>> We do.  I believe PHB was waiting for an OID assigned by IANA for
>> must staple.   I'm not sure the request was ever submitted, but
>> I'll follow up and make sure this moves forward.
>> 
>> Jeremy
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: TLS [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:48 PM To:
>> [e-mail] Subject: [TLS] OCSP must staple
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It seems there is a draft to have OCSP must staple 
>> (draft-hallambaker-muststaple-00).  Does anybody know what the
>> status of that is?  I've tried to contact the author but didn't get
>> any reply.
>> 
>> Is this something we want adopt?
>> 
>> 
>> Kurt
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list 
>> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list 
>> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 
> _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list 
> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>