Re: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms

Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2016 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1151A1A57 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrcY50f1W-H6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU004-OMC1S23.hotmail.com (blu004-omc1s23.hotmail.com [65.55.116.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6BC1A1A56 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU177-W18 ([65.55.116.8]) by BLU004-OMC1S23.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:29:41 -0800
X-TMN: [oEO9/rqVHapHbTj8nQCWcikPHcwQiBO6]
X-Originating-Email: [yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU177-W18E00AB27F0A359CF4AF51C3C90@phx.gbl>
From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>
To: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:29:41 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CAF8qwaC-u-8HCTFegx+yhwSQibrrPULX0i6UaopfQrzaMS7gew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160111183017.GA12243@roeckx.be>, <CAF8qwaC-u-8HCTFegx+yhwSQibrrPULX0i6UaopfQrzaMS7gew@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2016 23:29:41.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[F266EED0:01D14CC7]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NSENBoFxA9XR9FS248B7EExp8Z8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:29:44 -0000

> (c) Servers which sign SHA-2 but fail if signature_algorithms omits 
> SHA-1. The ones I looked at were all from serving SHA-1 certificates, 
> so probably their SSL stack compares certs against sig_algs. 
I think SChannel is one of them.