Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF99 - Additional Session Added and Agenda Bash!

[Nico Williams <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I have two working groups already in the monday slot.   I doubt I'm unique
> in this.   It seems like you should put the important business in the slot
> that was previously scheduled, and the overflow into the Monday slot.
> It's hard to imagine how a discussion of the wiretapping thing could be
> anything other than a dance at the mic, full of sound and fury, signifying
> nothing.

+1

At some point decisions have to be made though, and someone will end up
on the rough side of consensus in the WG.  There could be (will be!)
appeals.  Lastly, the IESG could also decline to allow such a WG item to
get published.  This would all be much easier if the authors would just
go the ISE Informational route.  Then only the IESG needs to decide
anything -- either way the IESG will be the last stop for this train.

Better skip the Q/A at the WG meeting -- it makes no difference as to
determining consensus, and no one needs the other side screaming bloody
murder and judging one a moron or evil.  It won't be worthy of popcorn.
Just boring, oh so boring.

Nico
--