Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2
Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl> Thu, 04 January 2018 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C7E12D876 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 06:43:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tKQp038Xt9k for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 06:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl (mx-out.tlen.pl [193.222.135.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D667112D86C for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 06:43:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 24621 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2018 15:43:29 +0100
Received: from acpn5.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (HELO [192.168.1.22]) (mat.jonczyk@o2.pl@[83.10.219.5]) (envelope-sender <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <tls@ietf.org>; 4 Jan 2018 15:43:29 +0100
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <60555d44-340d-8aa7-eb45-3a23b758e5d2@o2.pl> <CABcZeBN=JHV3gY_JCkCUHHASEqcUQTUmmpRY5i66Dv53k=Z3Ag@mail.gmail.com> <3685a850-03ec-5162-414b-c2676022d661@o2.pl> <CABcZeBO0nzmfcA+1ujxceDtNKPGUBZQtBg4-yN-OpOSyEJ3bNg@mail.gmail.com> <eb4530ad-2e6e-d5b6-72e7-4f84dae635e3@o2.pl> <5afdbc7f-30bb-4de2-6a72-588b8edc55d8@akamai.com> <235782bf-c26b-12c4-391a-26b654a8b9af@o2.pl> <CABcZeBMtU41cuNw=JGVRe8=7GtAzCL1RsRnm3UKeNgBb5FFicw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
From: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <466bac48-539e-a651-2edd-c8d4006c89fe@o2.pl>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:43:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMtU41cuNw=JGVRe8=7GtAzCL1RsRnm3UKeNgBb5FFicw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-WP-MailID: d7757ea91c3e0ed1e175660100ea7d1a
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2
X-WP-SPAM: NO 000000A [cSOk]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Nr_yteshoXVl0LtNbpY-b2z_aaQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:43:34 -0000
W dniu 04.01.2018 o 15:22, Eric Rescorla pisze: > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl > <mailto:mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>> wrote: > > W dniu 03.01.2018 o 18:05, Benjamin Kaduk pisze: > > On 01/03/2018 10:17 AM, Mateusz Jończyk wrote: > >> Judging from TLS1.3's problems with middleboxes, content filtering isn't so > >> rare, especially in the corporate world. > >> > >> The provider of filtering services (for example OpenDNS) / middlebox > >> manufacturer would have to recognize if the client supports this mechanism. > >> Having support for TLS1.3 could be one such flag. > > > > Cherry-picking this one part just for enhanced clarity: I do not think > > support for TLS 1.3 can or should be such a flag -- there does not seem > > sufficient reason to block TLS 1.3 finalization for this proposal. > > I would like to ask You to add just this one flag: > access_administratively_disabled to TLS 1.3. This will allow graceful upgrade to > full proposed functionality of the access_administratively_disabled mechanism. > > > I am not in favor of this change at this time. > > I suspect I'm not in favor of the mechanism, but i'm definitely not in favor of > adding a placeholder alert for some mechanism which isn't specified. > OK, but what about this change considered separately? I have changed the semantics slightly: +access_denied_by_intermediary +: The access was denied by a network intermediary - i.e. a server other + than the client or the desired server, for example by an Internet Sevice + Provider. Justification: Network intermediaries (for example ISPs) may block traffic by using e.g. access_denied anyway. Make it more explicit by adding access_denied_by_intermediary. This will make censorship more transparent. Greetings, Mateusz > -Ekr > > I will try to submit an Internet Draft for the full mechanism till the end of > this week. > > Greetings, > Mateusz Jończyk > > > > > -Ben > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org <mailto:TLS@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls> > >
- [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] access_administratively_disabled v2 Sean Turner