IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 24 November 2025 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9CA8FD85F2 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:28:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lgd6Qbk0pyun for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:28:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1129.google.com (mail-yw1-x1129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B6E8FD843B for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1129.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-7866375e943so38095637b3.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:28:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1764026904; x=1764631704; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=P4Z3SQOVqx60uIEUDk/ryOBmDiH1TbbYhCGPUlFx1Ok=; b=EFRicbX5Q5clxnOYCs9AE+WRtRnBUDBVyHt8GKuvctfCCzMp6wXxc6tL9aF7I/c2IG cREVOxfKUiye6hQChdTj6EAMWBAkcmtLfRuiWIVIYCa+wG1Y+HO7QeCYmB5uDFDR+bt7 QDvePQXU7oC+/8HqUAdbFwat4/VCI7uRMcYGqAXms7lZnyaYuzHVTrOmeqANx0ZYyJNG HyWoNi5JtSnEKVQJ9DNI3OO5UPhf0HBGWck0gftadkqc9n6KjgGQkMrPjBQSXNX4Ihkc D7neetQd4/aAGIAHwzAhy/mFOY4Wou30TjwOA748QHwzUfjg8ikW0HRmKAFuvXWems9d mjcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1764026904; x=1764631704; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=P4Z3SQOVqx60uIEUDk/ryOBmDiH1TbbYhCGPUlFx1Ok=; b=PvsjY0b+49N1hbsSX4a6MAEjufCo/uS03RClDSyXCbV13+Y8yjT7PN64GVMH+VGcav S3lD5WgiDH8LXyG1HG2T+Uexb5fTUJnG+n7I09Vu7SgxIUZlOnHgPxHsk0IIRk7UJRrN 7QheSEBiqYIzRHRyI22/91roGwuCYxBYIQr+japEwkhcFA39K7RSTbBSjYN5m0B0BQLU V+Fq+2CCXK/JhIkkJfIGjMGiSimcUTJmYoN/wqEhgykd3rtfe4+QElWiJkpeZXBFSoNz WRDtwouZVqKTXDPJwagxnEoHbhKdmqIeQZVC/rmA+4hledr5kj/eo/lQaSmIO+1lcLDR e9XQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWDzo4hjh6Myq0vVIN5NoE7lktItiODsDyHJWWobXesL1o67RCPeDzLetecyovW8HjnpfY=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywv6mXHtTlE38KPxCiVWIKLLOnzbsLYLdxfmYokFzE0qRAZ61mr ekQW7wD8Qp7N7HIP3h2QskRzVzvIJ5/D16WEf1b0P5nVctwK9TPKV8LL7cU4Zv88b78dOq253z7 S53KUQbGolmEL4VNw8HR41OGPvZUAGFd2D9dsPFSvZw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu4JaXfmlKmpjihmCl0rRjlRRPDj/Rd3f5qz/KgVzlYg4vPxdRjJmGq/h515ch ARVzHHpMjeSRxT/XzGAJIpgOQH0aNaYoq3vDVCo0jU4C+WrcsXrsYB67ZvFCPdZCfryfdgEl6f2 hX5/Jg5wRm51Rmy22tcU6IKAgTlVQNlyyNAGu1W51dGo7vEUc1dRRA7BK+lRfn8K04rV9NwAPav 55mNU3jKypM5IBvOszbSPDDWGZHpH++lOo1EMXTWp0zpLPdvCJ/HeVRYFoSvFCHLlKoG5lJ1eI7 4MlNs5HwxJVjVyUsUC8fB97iXeIw53ihikrT+RQG5u1IU8K5zrgTchFLoIftLXeXT4Ah0Cp1h19 B2krB/T9rIA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHMBAhhdovUU+sb5NpUrl1hwHQGIPRzF0vVt82cIi2WqaMYm1MLKNglRtkFbwS7c3aZ7v/s99S9ynaW7R2nM+I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:319:b0:787:ea86:bc35 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-78a8b495a29mr121249487b3.24.1764026904034; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:28:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <176236867319.904123.10146982018394612684@dt-datatracker-5df8666cb-7l4w5> <bc79d0a8-ff81-4b02-aca0-4221ad6a8fd0@cs.tcd.ie> <066c8811-e20c-4eab-8be6-f4d0f94b89ee@cs.tcd.ie> <MN2PR17MB40317B6D973B075BE57C52B0CDD0A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR17MB40317B6D973B075BE57C52B0CDD0A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:27:46 -0800
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bmeRFOrhCU57ZKGoCFWwE4Ys9nldEQTrG8c85MB0F2sLE6ul4J_LLfNJeI
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMPxv1xOQ3a+4V+wesAL2EGeoa4RC60m-w498=Fet6eng@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd505006445f8428"
Message-ID-Hash: INBN73BDKI2HDHPIXRPQ7PKRVEHB7UNT
X-Message-ID-Hash: INBN73BDKI2HDHPIXRPQ7PKRVEHB7UNT
X-MailFrom: ekr@rtfm.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-tls-mlkem@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-mlkem@ietf.org>, "tls-chairs@ietf.org" <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NxdjwDDi_DOxLwbYLxJ2nnEZ5do>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

The adopt-but-park thing was for SLH-DSA.

-Ekr


On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 3:25 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
>    - Much worse than either of the above would be to add specific text
>    - to this document saying we prefer hybrids.
>
>
> We kind of did that implicitly, by marking one as RECOMMENDED Y and the
> other as N.
>
> > Also - what happened to the adopt-but-park plan? Did that get lost
> > in the fog of appeals?
>
> I thought there was a ruling that adopt-and-park wasn’t a legit action for
> the extant call for adoption.
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status