IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] The progress about theNegotiated FFDHE proposal

Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan@vimino.com> Sat, 05 December 2015 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <xuelei.fan@vimino.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FC51B2AF8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paeR1trRFFKV for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4161B2AF7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oixx65 with SMTP id x65so80686757oix.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 07:32:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vimino-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0V+p33Q5IpbQ+fqO9Y7P0cyQSJxLT/YKBkdsR1lRPTU=; b=AQp8d+xu7KaH28ok31XQCt44cN8sp4BTm7W7FQewSLXhTgC2achgf2wO9kX4ST2UKJ SnxvvXwZum8fRgeCQ7j8sl2pw8fflntdNaMiKx0K8f4Awh1+VnzMFtcKngHwQmd8dWib dwRIwSCpxTS4g3kHGyUmk3HvKbacEQFPIBFNrhfTDWUPti8NR0W3unY4tggxdtSWO+jn GVYP9X4s5j8o1JnnyX4wjvgmfIRz0nF/QpZYnV/ZMMxDlWe9x9DwNmarBJ4okMKvHW+l wggmO5cFh9K+3mvQpZWSDDvdOiZ3qe7HDgtnbfs1kmcL44DyL8gzPx0RnFF3XknzCcSX Z8cA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0V+p33Q5IpbQ+fqO9Y7P0cyQSJxLT/YKBkdsR1lRPTU=; b=FY1N6fLvM5dFt+k8B2jPQYutwVJFSxutRC3pGYbuGOLNDrI+tQzawxKzjDSEZ7BHC3 U8uguNaMI2EVPgjPQeaIwZc9YJlNYJUyei8ts8hyGWErgP10H6fH7M3+gAuvs0pI29lv uh/m88zB+5g6ZHQjrAgdePpbTV/9cvVOSX8alcanwrWNoo2bPkbFfRhexp2kH7vqIAf2 u4KS+BmMxTzhKx8GeMZRN0f5DY/6CmJavVhfuHarM59rJlbnG624YSlnHHBOszSDmSvY fPMXwjBlHJq63WWktDVAcOE7nbfVkYjNRfjgLMNEUOlTEBZpiBoIyOt5T5fr22BVrL00 H8nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjUewsVlEroFMq9ikt5UkqmQm3+LQcE9u8uJ18iIU2XlJONynYwjf3s5IzkxA6g6DqvhdH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.208.83 with SMTP id h80mr16549941oig.74.1449329560221; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 07:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.18.75 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:32:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [148.87.19.214]
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 23:32:40 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAgBOhu4151RouRNrCOv8p9PC55nTgdDU28QOEryEF7DHb1BAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan@vimino.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d2ed69990a80526285532"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/OMMgExOTUb179EfHwsC7kPT-unw>
Subject: [TLS] The progress about theNegotiated FFDHE proposal
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 15:32:42 -0000

Hi,

Any one know why the negotiated FFDHE draft hang on MISSREF state for more
than 180 days?

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe/

Thanks & Regards,
Xuelei

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email