Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail

Hovav Shacham <hovav@hovav.net> Tue, 26 January 2010 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hovav@hovav.net>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508C43A69CA; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4sTujMw0VETk; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from iport-c1-out.ucsd.edu (iport-c1-out.ucsd.edu [132.239.0.176]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EF73A69C7; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:48 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAL/kXkuE7zNQ/2dsb2JhbADaEoQ5BA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,348,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="169396375"
Received: from csesmtp2.ucsd.edu (HELO cse-smtp.ucsd.edu) ([132.239.51.80]) by iport-c1-out.ucsd.edu with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Jan 2010 12:53:00 -0800
Received: from [128.54.5.123] (unknown [128.54.5.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cse-smtp.ucsd.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12045005C; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <8EAC649B-248E-4255-8A9A-147ED2D12AD1@hovav.net>
From: Hovav Shacham <hovav@hovav.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB775841199A56@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:59 -0800
References: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB775841199A56@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:52:49 -0000

I was not on your list, but:

>   (1) I prefer publishing the specification as-is.

-hs.