Re: [TLS] DH generator 2 problem?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 08 October 2020 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBB13A0BDB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vNNnHDuKqSFW for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006633A0BD9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 098IEnlA029146; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 19:23:34 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=VC6BkAMY/Pn4Ddp5on6mbdg+uBxxXq4LukE3fN+Rp0g=; b=ez5r5RoxTzdkPG8sN74b8Sap3OyYEj67Ysy4gxi8OFlJZl6tUMCRxaMhm+Ku5lgSZaxR kqQ3TYnb+5dKDVzdHD7mXpaF/qTts11/8hN3/I0GLMTgxSWzP16iP4lqbNACJitv6fQ8 RuthjxsyYYVbCJQkwARJt7Y4/LLT3v4Q12tX/uobnEkP8lTWae65ZYf7rc7Nfoi8rwHc joEmZbxDy2/nvd7VQi0HHXmQjGPUeIoK9bSFtSbnu59QcTK4ZHL5qFYq54TCEr2CVfsb d/M9kWxMay8oB//O092+G5pltoZziWwl4nEBqY6C0zgg64VAut4HT0wVzx3jI3xWJdpQ wQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 33xhqfxhkm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:23:34 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 098IGbAm020992; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:23:34 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 33xq9a6sfd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:23:33 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:23:32 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:23:33 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] DH generator 2 problem?
Thread-Index: AQHWnZwToyjRDlPi3EaOjNRFCH6GXKmOBQeA
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:23:32 +0000
Message-ID: <086337A6-C3CD-4E29-B863-85A60A55A8AB@akamai.com>
References: <d876f953-2d5a-40a4-5738-b2bc24705f2c@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <d876f953-2d5a-40a4-5738-b2bc24705f2c@pobox.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E3C4980E12AA914395AE3F4B149622B0@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-08_12:2020-10-08, 2020-10-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=888 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2010080131
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-08_12:2020-10-08, 2020-10-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=842 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2010080132
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.60) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PBLj6d-7zk9vPik7yLlyzLMS-Ro>
Subject: Re: [TLS] DH generator 2 problem?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:23:37 -0000

>    Should we define some new DH parameters which use a
    different generator?  Maybe the primes are fine....

I think the efforts these days are focused on using X25519, X448, etc.