IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Static DH timing attack

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B328E3A0CE5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckGsU54VJqhc for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECDE3A0CEE for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089Et4Jj002682 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:04:22 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=aY8QEuFosljW+lSoQiWtkvweKtIWO7riVcR7uygF5u0=; b=XAhj/6bFicU4hGcqQrUOaul9kBTtQE3dwD0/nTbNHiq/V12K1Ies2L1G/XsyI78p5opn YKllxUXA05ubaWB0fbAMKjaQHkvA6rIKMITi1cqOVPJ2otvS+owHqCfQdHGeeRAkQq/O OLZxp/eRmHMZ5TPhlYm5Y9C4csB5u0ZY94TWqfngbHVy/6G1f9qq/mT5LoQ8vi7rVoSf J98MZEBMSDWoB4hZoDDQPyvvynPQugQJZ1XmXKi7PuRr2VgqkU+tRjxB+OLp4qIUS8b3 Q3WhoCVN/A69+V+DlmcO5iQRxW4g75e/nGr9VX1bJUabSjIu75+D5tuCuDSf51LK+Ldx SA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33byj4wtve-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:04:21 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089EkprW000988 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:04:20 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 33c8n9smfs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:04:20 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:04:20 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:04:19 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Static DH timing attack
Thread-Index: AQHWhrp+9EGmAKHnM0S2YOV3OYQKzg==
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:04:19 +0000
Message-ID: <5595BB40-3AFD-4327-B7B7-5E63FFC594DD@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5595BB403AFD4327B7B75E63FFC594DDakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-09_09:2020-09-09, 2020-09-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=775 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009090131
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-09_09:2020-09-09, 2020-09-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=712 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009090135
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PFSHmUOieQOMMtRn55h5e4GXn0w>
Subject: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:04:25 -0000

https://raccoon-attack.com/

Do we need a short RFC saying “do not use static DH” ?

I am probably not the only one thinking fondly of draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13 now.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email