Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart

On Apr 18, 2015, at 01:21, Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org> wrote:

> Thanks, Sean.
> 
> Just to confirm, the WG -00 I-D will be essentially identical to the lasted individual submission, and then we'll work on the changes for -01, right?

I think that’s probably the easiest way for folks to track the changes.  You can do one, get it posted and then follow up later in the day with the known changes to keep the ball rolling..

> I've actually just left for a vacation, so it will be around a week and a half before I can submit the -00 draft. But then we're not in any kind of rush for this one.

Thanks for the heads up, I’ll ping you if I don’t hear from you when you get back.  Enjoy your vacation.

spt

> Bodo
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-04-16 12:21 GMT-04:00 Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>:
> Based on list discussion we’re going to go adopt this draft as a WG.
> 
> Bodo please submit a WG version of this draft so we can begin addressing Brian’s comments in the WG -01 version.
> 
> Thanks everybody!
> 
> spt
> 
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:20, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > There’s been some interested expressed in having http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart/ adopted as a TLS WG item.  If you would like for this draft to become a WG document, and you are willing to review drafts as it moves through the process please indicate as much on this thread.  If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). Thanks in advance.
> >
> > J&S
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 