Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Wed, 16 September 2015 21:12 UTC
Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6A1A1B6E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iu2lv5vcmRuf for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB141A1B62 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so97698410vka.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xq3dRe3A+KgWTo9YSORbgLjyZfrS98St036FjrpsfhU=; b=PGrk+0dEzi8Lox5plKKffPXfRq6cpUfZ9h0vxfRCHF9pyE0IQ+kcn8eGLrLHgOoiUc cfaCQaeXRI4p9uKfWcLisccSyVWm0VrwYW8oW0e3otEVJFtQvaM7eXlY+YFt3srCsLjv QKJTadKACOl42KmL42M6WN8IWe52X2gilcGIdUzJpam9qqlgnFt+CxHPNk4fv1SCEsdj 9o8cmaHEAn+Fb+pOz6CS4Gp8CDe3I2ftqLjrPaCI1C1hqcXSR6Bs/frAWQ6qoOUxVBRh Ah7E1EdhBfvJymfmkgNBTzd37ILGwzn+sYDPW5ljgDf2uG6yOffrsLjCcnLzkvzEskTz ZVZQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.180.130 with SMTP id d124mr30885592vkf.120.1442437927670; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.18.65 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPY6JRnLiqd=-aQQ+8kZGHa3TujSr9+hn1CSt1B_X-r=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFewVt7_23v18HpzzDy4ew1h66iNTBOSdP+CVBgc9T-4Z3isfA@mail.gmail.com> <20150916210113.GP13294@localhost> <CABcZeBPY6JRnLiqd=-aQQ+8kZGHa3TujSr9+hn1CSt1B_X-r=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMV+xG00dccyFS0s+8c=xd8Uj1qRtFgi+dZ=Dkrujj4_FCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114388344a20b4051fe3c0a0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PUOVpMm-Dimh--adEuImCwqagEI>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:12:27 -0000
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > In addition, they are already part of TLS, so the question would be if we > have > consensus to remove them.... > I see a bunch of +1s and zero -1s. Just saying... -- Tony Arcieri
- [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Tony Arcieri
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Tom Ritter
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Brian Smith
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Tony Arcieri
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Brian Smith
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Bill Frantz
- Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous … Nico Williams