Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6A1A1B6E
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id iu2lv5vcmRuf for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB141A1B62
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so97698410vka.2
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; 
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=xq3dRe3A+KgWTo9YSORbgLjyZfrS98St036FjrpsfhU=;
 b=PGrk+0dEzi8Lox5plKKffPXfRq6cpUfZ9h0vxfRCHF9pyE0IQ+kcn8eGLrLHgOoiUc
 cfaCQaeXRI4p9uKfWcLisccSyVWm0VrwYW8oW0e3otEVJFtQvaM7eXlY+YFt3srCsLjv
 QKJTadKACOl42KmL42M6WN8IWe52X2gilcGIdUzJpam9qqlgnFt+CxHPNk4fv1SCEsdj
 9o8cmaHEAn+Fb+pOz6CS4Gp8CDe3I2ftqLjrPaCI1C1hqcXSR6Bs/frAWQ6qoOUxVBRh
 Ah7E1EdhBfvJymfmkgNBTzd37ILGwzn+sYDPW5ljgDf2uG6yOffrsLjCcnLzkvzEskTz
 ZVZQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.180.130 with SMTP id d124mr30885592vkf.120.1442437927670; 
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.18.65 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPY6JRnLiqd=-aQQ+8kZGHa3TujSr9+hn1CSt1B_X-r=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFewVt7_23v18HpzzDy4ew1h66iNTBOSdP+CVBgc9T-4Z3isfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150916210113.GP13294@localhost>
 <CABcZeBPY6JRnLiqd=-aQQ+8kZGHa3TujSr9+hn1CSt1B_X-r=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:12:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMV+xG00dccyFS0s+8c=xd8Uj1qRtFgi+dZ=Dkrujj4_FCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114388344a20b4051fe3c0a0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PUOVpMm-Dimh--adEuImCwqagEI>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:12:27 -0000

--001a114388344a20b4051fe3c0a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> In addition, they are already part of TLS, so the question would be if we
> have
> consensus to remove them....
>

I see a bunch of +1s and zero -1s. Just saying...


-- 
Tony Arcieri

--001a114388344a20b4051fe3c0a0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Eric Rescorla &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ekr@r=
tfm.com">ekr@rtfm.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div=
 dir=3D"ltr">In addition, they are already part of TLS, so the question wou=
ld be if we have<div>consensus to remove them....</div></div></blockquote><=
div><br></div><div>I see a bunch of +1s and zero -1s. Just saying...<span><=
/span>=C2=A0</div><br><br>-- <br>Tony Arcieri<br><br>

--001a114388344a20b4051fe3c0a0--