IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6E129854 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:55:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0K61KYVeOB1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682DE129697 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E793943343E; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D693A43340C; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1487948130; bh=gr7KHq8Gb+UHPZpnQ/khxJtP/tz7t/O2B8d69wCs3Jc=; l=308; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OmgN8IWinQuirTX7RbYhJ/evNGJdjSLZwYuCeVW4q7FznOMLZaxh5a25dfkKmrchM lJvowoZGH2b256ZWEpsgQjZfqaHJLqOrs3vsc8EE9/aA0mI0Iaotr2OpexXZu1mAJC Dj1rM6ly8LORpT4jIsi+AOL1+BcmN9f3yWnNKgcA=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE421FC88; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:55:30 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:55:30 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: William Whyte <wwhyte@onboardsecurity.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
Thread-Index: AQHSjG+AlPI2FEigPUqrjf2oARXzl6F06JEA///CuVCAAO0yAIACYtYAgAAlk4CAABSvIIAAYOOA//+sl6A=
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:55:30 +0000
Message-ID: <92ffd8e65f444cfca784689198590b21@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAOgPGoA0tTmwkcC3CPdgUd=6QNTpTxRT8pkXLD-Yezzh05b+KA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVTWmwyyBQrTLZ1up09vTfwKpUj_-FriEspEXD5hevshA@mail.gmail.com> <f79b14ab6eaf4ab6b18323b569337583@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20170222171156.GA31015@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CAOgPGoDtSpwimU_EZvdRmCb_hAVJmTauS62qgPznaZJy6V7mJA@mail.gmail.com> <1CAE4CFE-2A9D-4A8D-93D4-2BA304894F96@gmail.com> <91c7562e92814e3a9ebb57dfa6c59610@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAND9ES1xj6ZEKz1hT-NWr16juUvreQdAx-gTtdav49OsLjT04w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAND9ES1xj6ZEKz1hT-NWr16juUvreQdAx-gTtdav49OsLjT04w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PdgYlxBa8sKs0H5AeQnXEy58Csk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@tools.ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:55:33 -0000

> There's an argument that it's worth building in a 256-bit cipher for quantum resistance. Not clear that AES-256 is the best 256-bit cipher though.

Yes, I get that.

"not clear" is a highly uncompelling argument, tho.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email