RE: [TLS] extension number conflict
Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com> Fri, 09 February 2007 18:34 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFaZn-0006v5-FO; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:34:27 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFaZm-0006tU-Az for tls@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:34:26 -0500
Received: from smtp-dub.microsoft.com ([213.199.138.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFaZi-00012u-UA for tls@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:34:26 -0500
Received: from dub-exhub-c302.europe.corp.microsoft.com (65.53.213.92) by DUB-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.129.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.685.24; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:34:11 +0000
Received: from EA-EXMSG-C307.europe.corp.microsoft.com ([65.53.221.19]) by dub-exhub-c302.europe.corp.microsoft.com ([65.53.213.92]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:34:11 +0000
From: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Mike <mike-list@pobox.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:30:03 +0000
Subject: RE: [TLS] extension number conflict
Thread-Topic: [TLS] extension number conflict
Thread-Index: AcdL42IUPyIvVf5aTeqZul3lKAzvHwAlO6A1
Message-ID: <A15AC0FBACD3464E95961F7C0BCD1FF01DA2B7D1@EA-EXMSG-C307.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <200702082259.XAA10273@uw1048.wdf.sap.corp> <45CBB5B5.9020305@pobox.com> <A15AC0FBACD3464E95961F7C0BCD1FF01DA29082@EA-EXMSG-C307.europe.corp.micros oft.com>,<p062408ddc1f173ede5ce@[10.20.30.108]>
In-Reply-To: <p062408ddc1f173ede5ce@[10.20.30.108]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc:
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
I'm not sure how to take this. Is it considered inappropriate to talk openly about possibilities. I can whitness that as implementer this can be a problem. I don't consider it severe enought to go through the trouble of writing an I-D about it, but it's good the hear others experiances. /Stefan ________________________________________ From: Paul Hoffman [paul.hoffman@vpnc.org] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:43 PM To: Stefan Santesson; Mike; tls@ietf.org Subject: RE: [TLS] extension number conflict At 12:01 AM +0000 2/9/07, Stefan Santesson wrote: >What about assigning an experimental/local range that can be used >until the real number is assigned. >That should avoid conflicts effectively. If you want to make a change to how the numbers are assigned, you should write an Internet Draft to change the procedure and bring it to the TLS WG. "What about this" and "how about that" are fairly meaningless when there is already rules that people agreed to on how to do this. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Paul Hoffman
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict tom.petch
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson