IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E0E127419 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teFk4UWrk5Em for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D643B124D37 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m22so817278iob.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9iNUUtu/c4tcuoZqxSGBlR6vv3Fkh1OHm9XdYspB9Qo=; b=l9BDr3u0R8J/XBQDYvCDrnfb0BRhfJsxaH85UaATYoVUqYVdEOnW6FqZP22uEhuZeb 2ejhCsi7Ren59h3JMSroH832+Ay+mhkYVMkOchYjiNNYCyfygr0d3RM+izsAHj5vywnn lWrKzU4ZR52l7PsUtYxWkgtMQvJ2GsDLkv+76NWnLw7UAFGQTQvA6j8sF0u198yvRjrD lo3u7orRa3hxBJAAGjMPQLYLook9PuMXgaBhqc/OWCcObNQTcLqEh47vFgQ5jINH/sds lficKH0KecdQlRyxZn0xJ1pyESv4lt4IysDq+TKwLZ7R7a5WYF4rmsW1BTJ4cZAjBQdX 2guQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9iNUUtu/c4tcuoZqxSGBlR6vv3Fkh1OHm9XdYspB9Qo=; b=Fm0A/WFQ3JxYDgCByU5u0zZj4TjYoURTjGaLJLAvWdW4JSZgCRgQi0pXJZNIQgY8s4 lCYeuzz+AlWNW7SnECMR5t3gJEVx4IHiTyAbGYrLm6THdWW7e0nw17dKUJ58SEf0vSV/ /UU/81hqdaAGeFoWh3pd5chFP0lyTO0uU6sRK+cf5eUvYNWzUUQDdFCo/mIJ6t8aek2s 5WwEXEp1yaWSNioaRbeC1E9AjsYxgDWrAUjcuUFzAn2XfPfEn3mdTY4J6Nxjbs5tMgwo T2iMB1Mq2UpLWK52PEs23LoidgLFkosI3TPJ6PW9Zgn6khaTcgnS4cwOyRBotUCr+COL ducw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EylcvtcKxtxyLUlpH7voSVtl5R4hNCPq7yuNZy7Mb7PYV8b5AD L0Z8+4xSuHIW3kXKpwmmMWJpSupwG7iujl3A0jLk8A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvHOvwuUewtrQ6wQglleSYkY6aSR1J/JNVjLRt7wqQlpX2vrb+XeI6ck2SbMNLQWPJU+HwQLwmKZTBaVH4XE58=
X-Received: by 10.107.52.146 with SMTP id b140mr1408618ioa.8.1520959033017; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.29.138 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CB55AABB-8937-4F6B-B5AC-B6F262F08A4F@akamai.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com> <3F8142DE-EADB-4AB9-A204-7D87ACDCD3E3@akamai.com> <CAPsNn2VE_7+rWT0fp9rrVnZrgcY7ORLWTee+kf_Av1dqm4CiDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CB55AABB-8937-4F6B-B5AC-B6F262F08A4F@akamai.com>
From: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:37:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPsNn2U_xG28Tumo3oRkQ+6=BHzgv-6YtgNSpwvhdFFRWc7EQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11441cd4e1c52605674dde0a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/PxEDzOC_YbvT94svhqXri4F7shs>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:37:16 -0000

*>>* I hope that we can all work together to craft a solution.   We don't
want fragmentation and multiple DIY solutions.



> Well, I’d be fine with a bunch of point solutions that were only sold and
deployed in an enterprise because, as I said last time, this is too risky
for the public Internet.


We would be fine with that also.  We are looking for something only INSIDE
the enterprise.



> So then, who is “we”?


"We" is a consortium of organizations.   I would say over 50 so far.  They
operate large data centers.   They are in manufacturing, insurance,
finance, and others.


Nalini


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> *>* I hope that we can all work together to craft a solution.   We don't
> want fragmentation and multiple DIY solutions.
>
>
>
> Well, I’d be fine with a bunch of point solutions that were only sold and
> deployed in an enterprise because, as I said last time, this is too risky
> for the public Internet.
>
>
>
> So then, who is “we”? ☺
>
>
>



-- 
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email