Re: [TLS] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart-00.txt

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Fri, 04 June 2010 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5763A69D5 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YcAc+AiUhU8 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E19C3A69D4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.1]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o54H48T2013693 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:08 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1275671048; bh=qjUungxmUCdh4LEiUzquItJ7QH8=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=jY6Zq/ZpICYjgJ4QVXf0epezRfyxBHZFmx2qZTg8aAXSqJn6ATV0j+CWfSrJ5GF4n pz3QeuzIipR8mVe0Rqrpw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=yDzeO4UCOod7UripHTLfsuFm4M+YAdcHM+lwAQQGIPFnWXlNp2LcJjB8HOaCwKe91 XFHszOMrmmJcmLvIWxyRg==
Received: from iwn41 (iwn41.prod.google.com [10.241.68.105]) by hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o54H3q5s028921 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:07 -0700
Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so1197918iwn.32 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.156.66 with SMTP id v2mr948485ibw.107.1275671044859; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.129.137 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C0930C4.4030806@extendedsubset.com>
References: <201006041537.o54FbT23020988@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <4C0930C4.4030806@extendedsubset.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:04:04 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinoI3ibR7ZHfTnN52UzaVjCUGqY89YWY-GNjzqI@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
To: Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:04:28 -0000

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com> wrote:
> The $256 question is then, how many other servers are there that are
> using similar optimizations?

As noted in the draft, we have some fairly extensive real world
testing of False Start. Both with the application data being delayed
somewhat from the Finished and with it being in the same TCP packet.
We have so far found one host on the Internet which doesn't support
it.


AGL