[TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Mon, 23 October 2017 17:50 UTC
Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE231397F3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qz7kIR9qwOZq for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6AA0137C4A for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b6so17644360pfh.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7sMqsXo2nKKnGrBZcW8ODReRFVA+vrVq1t1zRnB3K50=; b=dqvkx/onAyZzYAUaTDRFxG5J9HrVmDIpzaOmURzfZUCNm1G1c5HIlJawy33/NkKgo1 nqiEGnwASN5KdU9DFSeS4RFFHI9tzr8JWjlDQJhAH9P9JPgfXZPlK/TNfcwzwFBp0pXO G4/95STziDm3lqb4S4FpV3zY/fmD7O92/fgNt4zPaZMSM14kD5kIxsTXpuv9ocSMHGLr rT7CzFFA10dl77Ym4uHvILLNTJlpGvbJ0B1u73fWS/LJtLXPOoiEhOHB45ZX6VGe6elL vUv1dE1j3UmE8KPILRiftXS/9BPI4jUpKBZmmpjNkjCwCAk2yflhDiVIweARsYgjvzGy VIEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7sMqsXo2nKKnGrBZcW8ODReRFVA+vrVq1t1zRnB3K50=; b=K2CPq2Dh+ZYyALCWlrhOcm5L8CjwVznyz9rMJBeHroVBOFQaejW7Fj/j7l6pgVTOPQ 14abBkiFwnrQVQmqBGNDTdPXJx6wxUvA5FvNh805FgaY0d304fYvYVfNhSK7o2dxaBXV 1R7XwbtAlCuGNxQzBKqQwVBjQKH4V8Fd1v5LCCQsyFgF2Al12ndNqwF5LxSTUKN2Qo2F M0ga5zRMFjRKERXrSutIJwWuB333JodYBRFv/ahvbb9j6MBTc7jIEDWWS+tY7dHxCfxV WfO1oITDdXWva4V5ZcHdafOX+cYeXEgtOM8KJy0UIlPhy1upwY7fKV+gm4H7Q2Dftv3i R9VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX6TLED6pYvr6cFBmPI9Iv9pk+o/YDSPpKYpvAKuD8aJBpzAmFr O0fT5UE5ODm7AfUr+IJqqG2GU+2xTlzHWPe3Yeyr2D88
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Qd7f5/vTrSpei1pV9+Ruz6737CQXdunkK8scaoWhq2fDVTvzDkwCFRwc3R9DlgzO+TQ+Cn1GuLwP29wd1WFy8=
X-Received: by 10.84.179.129 with SMTP id b1mr10689667plc.235.1508781044153; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.218.165 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:50:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoBpDpzpg0LyvZmnxq8qktRGT3_ArGtdCNNsC_KjwaiUMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c11a71c2e5213055c3a76c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QD2TwRvwNkYmSgjNzl7ZGsmRSSI>
Subject: [TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:50:46 -0000
ekr proposed a PR (#47) for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates that clarified the specification required rules to include Internet Drafts. I believe this is not the intent and we should close the issue. I think the intent of specification required is to allow a community that needs a code point to make a specification available in a public location that is relevant to that community. I don't think an an I-D would be appropriate in most cases. Cheers, Joe
- [TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-regist… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] Closing PR#47 on draft-ietf-tls-iana-re… Benjamin Kaduk