Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Tue, 08 May 2018 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=86667ee204=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBC312EAB1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qVqWRdu2i9f for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from llmx2.ll.mit.edu (LLMX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317DE12DA06 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local) by llmx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id w48KQSjn042479; Tue, 8 May 2018 16:26:28 -0400
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors
Thread-Index: AQHT5un4JfKJUK4PqEWWp9/ditCkLaQmTiqAgAAB7ID///fEgA==
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 20:26:28 +0000
Message-ID: <3D980955-3C7A-46C2-A43E-1CC4A6BE02BD@ll.mit.edu>
References: <5F30CC9E-EFFC-4A36-801F-A17B9DDF85E0@sn3rd.com> <CE4D387B-A4E8-425D-8FC5-7706C1D6307F@sn3rd.com> <1334EA4C-9432-49E4-9DC4-DEEDF1C3C0AF@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <1334EA4C-9432-49E4-9DC4-DEEDF1C3C0AF@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
x-originating-ip: [172.25.87.160]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha256; boundary="B_3608641587_1561328940"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-08_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805080191
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QIgICe7AJ3sC2MMmdHuGPvDQ09Y>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 20:26:37 -0000

If it's intended to be a "test-vector", then by all means it should be a standard.

If it's just for illustration - Informational or BCP is fine.

My $0.02.
--
Regards,
Uri Blumenthal
´╗┐On 5/8/18, 12:56, "TLS on behalf of Salz, Rich" <tls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

    I dislike standard, and am fine with Informational or BCP.
     
    
    _______________________________________________
    TLS mailing list
    TLS@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls