[TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 15 January 2025 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D743C1FCE8A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:26:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bc-zge5Frl8u for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:26:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061F3C1E8947 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ee51f8c47dso180960a91.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:26:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1736965569; x=1737570369; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LE/tH5xsxRDILGllGPQ+clEJFJe6zrlGEu7tbfASn1M=; b=agoQP6qEIuz/yrQfppeyXFR9werGq+8zllwC1NwSMJ18TA7DJxVp9Bo6rRLjyIz6bF 1drFlY9VzFOr3/ff9D8gkW+CXC3dty6KDbdOgUlJGxobl6uLHlIEzArEG1hbpoSbYym0 M/Hp97TYroneclwjajNyULpGQ8XEpLdYvpDXs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736965569; x=1737570369; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LE/tH5xsxRDILGllGPQ+clEJFJe6zrlGEu7tbfASn1M=; b=otShzRtgkcfDMunbwUERYyIYo+OGikjaD3+1ebiCHhwOqm7m4CQdaOCvGi0jHnmD5h 7tAjtI/AokPR7hHrlEwcmvu281A2gz98q/0lAvhXtSuQvaau0Uk5kLO0flp8SoNF4LhM CsqgRe/ufMM7OohW4cYE5U5diPtyBOwHzwRUypyjKNRgQ6A3miwDsT4rFhLukf4o3kHE Nsh1l5IhzcsUzkQG379JXk/KxR05UDtstTwPTbNBXjIs5Pr2zWjmix9xcOXOeyhvjH8Y yZBZhHj1lAi16B3EcgQTZrBhRe9nw0glz3Ye7lm3uk0awQg41SYVFPZPuz8niEGsUqH2 qv3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIg8/vEFJ0FQr35a18wtwvab5B+6txqOI6wB9yk2W58Ow7daGd TSmbbpp39yYJhwqdUDFOJqzZXSLO/uYmM4b79ZgRtFj1d7Lk2sB2UcAZ5MHqbzMivLcKGjD7bNO ysfqzPhLEqyLRgsSjIlqH/4qOuHSH6wip/DtD3w==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuYDea57y/u+H4jeyGBsqYled8I2Q4m4lrtE7VZ/FKzSJ76721hIiRFIFt5FBg tmi4Oz3l99JD9GbPQy5khQ4cAjgxBChLgTm2kgk6A1FTDp3jjl5S0el0WF6mE9+l4UpHlwLo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFljiVS8LmPDPYn04RIR1Lmiydlnefy4gfWzJIA63RiyxaFln7+J1nFqDanMFQppNrobGT20b9ZKP+doDMoerY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:54cb:b0:2ee:b666:d14a with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f548ec8a90mr48248407a91.17.1736965569185; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:26:08 -0600
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:26:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.5.0)
References: <CAE3-qLSe_KU2HkGu-LBGpmF=in4ZHKzotXRQMrO_AfYFv8pNrA@mail.gmail.com> <20250115163905.447729.qmail@cr.yp.to> <CAE3-qLS2462ThM5UVTJ_NukYEXAjR4teBhdNityj+acmqzueXg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE3-qLS2462ThM5UVTJ_NukYEXAjR4teBhdNityj+acmqzueXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:26:08 -0600
X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvZ93ouXGzHuIdTvAM-X9hrt2Wn2K0jRtXS7egIgXL_6wYR_JQ8qnX0fK1o
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iv2mVBnXLe9wGgQmDHvSMuxT_HmBgOh03wjJ7+9cZe-Yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd25cb062bc2cf29"
Message-ID-Hash: HUTDOLOA36QIPPVOHRPMF7HF3D7C2U2S
X-Message-ID-Hash: HUTDOLOA36QIPPVOHRPMF7HF3D7C2U2S
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QJfDiuDtUEm3lkYM5xsbXqMzDh0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Jan 15, 2025 at 11:37:58 AM, Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com> wrote:

Defining a minimum percentage of votes to have  the consensus would take
> care of the problem and the chairs at the IETF would love that.
>

No it wouldn’t and no we (speaking as former co-chair of two WGs) wouldn’t.

I’m not sure why we’re relitigating the works-pretty-OK process of
consensus calls from the chair and potential appeals.

 -T