IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E92612943B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:43:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OeLAYyzn9ZY5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF708129428 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03A6433462; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A8A433446; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1480653783; bh=jAANFzLoxSlAStr5mWE/2WiFJ5Wvu7HyW7IcPPxWp40=; l=496; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ch/0ZTYp+2i7b9/OuJigzq1QaOov9EPpQaaYYt2/yEPrCgL7eRIOeavo30ItOZCrD Zn8DbKuielJK23lDp/7ud35Rj1S8/FYGJChsXWRe2l7gTxDEwEI8ygNhwU/45m9ecZ bXfdlhcXuzSV0de8e5JKCjfOgfO++EwRdFGj5NNg=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC671FC8C; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:43:03 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:43:03 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
Thread-Index: AQHSQUF9yvv3al+6E0mEp3NhmRhrEqDwX4eAgAJbVYCAAC0nAIAABEIAgAFpLoCAAA++gP//xHQA
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:43:03 +0000
Message-ID: <577e248fa6454c178053e6559df9af54@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CF83FAD0-B337-4F9E-A80B-2BAA6826BF41@sn3rd.com> <FDFEA8C9B9B6BD4685DCC959079C81F5E1913B9D@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAOjisRy+Lt59rE-+_bJmD=0oQD+qbeUBsJQyOvH6OggfhqyYqg@mail.gmail.com> <1480566504487.58214@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <D538A9AE-7F5A-4A70-8EED-F7D4426CE087@dukhovni.org>, <CAHOTMVJzvf8v0S3vhFASekd6ksut0uNBhJDmuYzSQcJfy6JYpg@mail.gmail.com> <1480648354917.41781@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <1480648354917.41781@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QT0ZNQzmGjmD6fscHFLBfgPw9SA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:43:06 -0000

> In other words, the TLS WG and a small number of people who interact with
> it call it TLS 1.3.  That's hardly a strong argument when most of the rest of the
> world doesn't even call it TLS.

Strongly agreed

> pretty much the only reasons I've seen for TLS 1.3 are
> inertia, "we've always called it that"/"I don't want to change"/etc.

Yes.

Think outside the community.  The world calls it SSL.  Many of the vendors in this industry also call it SSL.

SSL 4 or greater.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email