Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Thu, 07 November 2013 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1311821E814E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:02:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZasUZSEqkBd for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4E721E8172 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail06.wdf.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id rA7IxvFK018930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 19:59:57 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BZK2qUE3oS6Sbp1HbKZ7Wgen9gEjjdepON1egLhGqCPpoVBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ralf Skyper Kaiser <skyper@thc.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:59:57 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20131107185957.8B48C1AA69@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
X-SAP: out
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:02:30 -0000

Ralf Skyper Kaiser wrote:
> 
> Some thoughts why SNI (host name) should be
> transmitted encrypted and not in clear.

But you are aware that there is no such thing as a
"confidential DNS lookup" (confidential towards whom anyways),
so that in general, what your browser is connecting will be
directly preceded by a cleartext DNS lookup with that very name...

(Not revealing the "next protocol" or client certs/identities
 is a different issue.)

-Martin