[TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style varints
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 06 October 2020 00:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0594B3A0EEE
for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7uuJdUujV0EY for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735AF3A0AC6
for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id f21so221195ljh.7
for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=9u93Ljut8nkdkpf+Qe5/JkkdXXvd0XzyxaXVGsKIOqw=;
b=g/4vjpIjIBswQF6biJLAxgykCZzHSHMILL1jwNnR5+hpsBvUDKlfCS9UYSudpLChZQ
KxRiM/wo2sMMZ+b1PuL4ilxwQTJ6dRs3iQgW+2jJdi1LL1mZrv8Q5KBrCHfVB8bGSPXN
2GafjBvK4wF5ctGDlIC5c2LE13VBCWNSAbH7G3sHxjuUReFzUbUIyvOagCjxAFKs60Rh
1jDjaKWvOz+zjNA2xFnybZJs6NKoUcLDcQaipULVs/0RxJwYSY8Oyc1bQ/fP+9Dj0R1Z
6rMV0wMIYrx/ReKOuvmd0naTS3EsEddTFdF7LwYgDR+jPcDBJjFCN2UWlkhl3rkCKZVm
0Fyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=9u93Ljut8nkdkpf+Qe5/JkkdXXvd0XzyxaXVGsKIOqw=;
b=JJNwYVLSECXZjESKYIUyaR4yxFMFiFWKQlX4Ua9gMWsJnEcLg08TNKqQLYrjvx4kKM
/MPPaO8Lh1e3BO802MN54XM0plGO27se2xXS0U0RjSTdH4PLTGKgxlph5E8d9oKHqkmi
gXxwpNCu/R1c1dtnCyGh4apRmo/GTjHMM4239G4gHyufZPzAWg3Mn/PYSZ0fjpmyQpfn
w+Bjt5PgFMjKkMT9aqP6+nCNlVpsaLRtMOoZ+ijBtuVLrtjCuLpLfC+ZJhZ4sUnErl/4
LN/je6k5QeYR2tS9eCHVYJealSRZdhGZ0IJClC/rq1dlm45LfymRmR2oYtCVn5XK1EFl
RmnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531soGE1H5ym0PZ2N5oUp9bcCTBvHX8z6tFYfRHs9hf2h+0OV+2Y
Har79sD85EhmF6p0p810/lVoT97RoKK87R+a6K9vwDDljIr2Np+f
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzc9aFzVkwvtFTVpklNFyM3BhCX5l6jHpZGqvF7tokGie0tDzCFR8aAkulKixvMvT3eZvbmLzaTdn0a14Pddrs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8114:: with SMTP id d20mr686484ljg.409.1601944491415;
Mon, 05 Oct 2020 17:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:34:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPNFhGoLhgqeR9ObwyU68BYq=hXG1PhXcqNsNDNFGGyaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c6edb05b0f5c4ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/RBTGRQcQSPfmHPHI4OYDLM6Ivaw>
Subject: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style varints
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:34:55 -0000
Hi folks, cTLS uses a bespoke varint format. Now that QUIC is nearly done, I propose adopting their varint format. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/28 Any objections? -Ekr
- [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style varints Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Marten Seemann
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Marten Seemann
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Christian Huitema
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Christian Huitema
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Nick Harper
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Nick Harper
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Christian Huitema
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Anders Rundgren
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style va… Mohit Sethi M