IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

Michael Gray <mickgray@au1.ibm.com> Sun, 13 December 2009 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mickgray@au1.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CE33A6877 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:26:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRybVhoyXFw2 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com (e23smtp02.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7C93A63D3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.247]) by e23smtp02.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nBDMNNt7007159 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:23:23 +1100
Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nBDMMC8o1400846 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:13 +1100
Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nBDMQ6nJ032397 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:26:06 +1100
Received: from d23ml003.au.ibm.com (d23ml003.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.22]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id nBDMQ67w032394; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:26:06 +1100
In-Reply-To: <4B22E23B.4090005@jacaranda.org>
To: David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@jacaranda.org>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <OF44C3DB02.80A53E1C-ON4A25768B.0079FB34-4A25768B.007AA5AA@au1.ibm.com>
From: Michael Gray <mickgray@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:19:38 +1000
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d23ml003/23/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2FP3HF80 | July 14, 2008) at 14/12/2009 09:33:08
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:26:23 -0000

David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@jacaranda.org> wrote:

> Michael D'Errico wrote:
> > Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Replace "cipher suite" with magic cipher suite value (MCSV)
> >> throughout.
> >
> > I'm not sure we want to call it "magic" in the RFC (even though I
> > am probably guilty of calling it that in previous messages).
> > Perhaps "special" would be a better adjective?
>
> Signalling cipher suite value?

+1

or Probing CSV
or Renegotiation CSV

I also think "magic" should be avoided.

> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status