Re: [TLS] WG Status of draft-ietf-tls-pwd

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3DF12D860 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIVSqIq19pJd for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB6412D825 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a125so15877638qkc.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J2HcAunxRUuMeKWniBsj/9RlM+F6cJh2clAOggKK5Go=; b=ttfjixEJoPDTZZvVnMtcPKD6YMcQPCak/LaGhwrihDgWjRZKu9wPlaIMvmASCV1ms1 JloyzXJ8yuUUPXcJiaaCF4LsfE8+yHimcPMxQhkbMWWoKhNeR5eNy/0JCgc7OUEFAx+7 n56fk9OP24kTaLjY3iP7WjvzvUVtMXvZyDRvSloLH/6f58qyKlyXiekmvNxdo2sVkOJg BN1E6I0yzGVDcclgjZWkvu2ZfYTG5Pc2wA3VDScRpwciwUP05iZnwqJXFCa+oSUnjE9H kgyY08NyWZxseJJ50aJm/XccsbBZO804c1/SVkKNZSe7uV3XiLEDVXunrvqElWd6DsOK 9dzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J2HcAunxRUuMeKWniBsj/9RlM+F6cJh2clAOggKK5Go=; b=Oc7NjBHmJdqwAlhU3khBTY0pPivEg3Qa3dayHcAcVDNw/Q8p6WGpZ0bcujUmc2MR7H 2ax886W/gKW7PAY+/1aqc4g1BWxtN4wZ2y4f6NsMJH2ZustcHMB2QMQv0IhZ9mZOm3Wt UBqVa+se8UTarNxcQDFqrKCg7vYblkzEdiOBx+gGBxywlfnLFOhy2MqlhrsLBIIV/nv4 qMAQ059f2sYaQatteGnK31t7mz5MEW595+6NV5V2FBKpy8GS4PauRs9CDPbVf2xCHWts TDuzsorLhXBv33Jx7fi+TBO7jOp+MFn6g2tiOdwpMfPB31N6OroMpgxjr+bUVH57kLs2 9dzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIIcM/zu3AVUg/iwlxlJEp8lUrEnqP6Iz3qrvNhV+5z86BVb44BeT0SaS2+AEvdrpXoFC+nQR+BJq9F4A==
X-Received: by 10.129.52.84 with SMTP id b81mr12597219ywa.8.1467046688276; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.132.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckZ4kZrWM4gd7cMoRHAry3LiPdHUG-savac0qcv2RY6Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <061589B7-B7E0-43E2-BD0B-EA620E352CA5@sn3rd.com> <CACsn0ckZ4kZrWM4gd7cMoRHAry3LiPdHUG-savac0qcv2RY6Ew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:57:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMLYG3jj=C=UAmH7o3HVBAZq5vnWA9R3bWHPjNXE9QYEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11406f0ab9a6630536456cbd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/RnNrJPrsz3lx0pOYZJHwsiBRKww>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG Status of draft-ietf-tls-pwd
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:58:12 -0000

I don't think we should take this as a WG work item. I'd be happy for Dan
to get a code point
under the new rules, which I would also be happy to consider effective as
of now.

-Ekr


On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 27, 2016 7:38 AM, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-pwd [0] has been parked [1] by the WG chairs since late
> 2013.  It was parked  by the WG chairs because there was no consensus to
> move the document forward during WGLC [2][3]. However, circumstances have
> changed namely the publication of Dragonfly Key Exchange RFC [4] and the
> proposed changes to the IANA registration rules for algorithm code points.
> In light of these two developments, the chairs want to revisit this
> decision and would like to know before 12 July if the WG wants to progress
> draft-ietf-pwd as a WG item to obtain algorithm code points under the new
> rules [5].
>
> Things have also changed in that JPAKE2 has a security proof IIUC. While
> the CFRG PAKE process has slowed, there are still a number of competing
> options here and I don't think "all of the above" is the right answer.
>
> >
> > Note that if the WG decides not to progress the draft the author will be
> free to pursue other publication paths, e.g., through the AD or the ISE.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > J&S
> >
> > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-pwd/
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6174/
> > [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aYIXwO8l4K8XdvUoW9ysHT8WzA0
> > [3]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Fep2-E7xQX7OQKzfxOoFInVFtm4
> > [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7664/
> > [5] Obviously, the draft needs to be revised in light of [3].
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>