Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Thu, 15 March 2018 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA1C129C56 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlQVdDojMaCr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x229.google.com (mail-ua0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12CB6126FDC for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e25so3277485uam.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dDqZB/UJ+Zh5PAjv3tpo2cn9UfPgUmRY8JK14oydXWQ=; b=rIPxtXaoGntbNZ6DNIUKl8HhaM5FulIvlj1UrEUY6WL/3qFANiXXBF/Qwvkffgn6gn Sekqmx2CIjtIkcqv6tuRVFCn4KxtlF05CLyWDO2+ICOqN8aJfpwsaxA5BG/CnfiGCaRN QY36lArsfTsZQlJ4XqTzzbEgvpaDLdi5hZhlF6QTh+brP5SZLYQw4t/k3/18WP5tVvXu nO2e9FXQdolzTx4Zi/LoZBjpyiPqIXnnCz9P5F+Yu99NkrT70CPaItZPNk6T/RKWhnZ2 Gdjf67pJULkNUFbPGyDbJIWcVo6EW86CnLxiq3hqV6MC6eZSOJArR9Z0FW+E1w6/Zq3p zujQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dDqZB/UJ+Zh5PAjv3tpo2cn9UfPgUmRY8JK14oydXWQ=; b=M5vyN9hc8SSGExtV7P29JGJiG8X0P3vTVfVsU0ldQUP9WEhPTWWfq5fiudecPEIGHM 17qnTZjQNTStCZc0n9OZsuzY5T5CD//S0VisLBo8WHeoWhmgoEGKIwdP9Qing5yeFfVQ JEjTUA/Ah917JYe2wowur3IMxhfBIxlFvNEAlobpFLogUNI/vPNSRsSnZYhZSJnOlFfP T2lOxOmVStZ3ohi/h1B6V/dfPM+42tNBv5YaW/7Az/7yTyDVSRHqyLY8vtwSUgtJi2lV 75XHeaFq4ufcjZ5o324sal5dom+EJmSqFz11wJ8aLgQxmR0RLf4LD4AZzsQTNmwKaIss GHfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FR80hg4jExjspyfDndnEw7tlbn8fpFPxMy2q6URVUdGG+Hj9Xi vNqNy8t3VEy38VJaWE9HCrMNJ02b+AeAcliYhQ4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELstos249cCZy6+lYbUoXxXx3RK1+kdJSjGz2wNhs2jruStoQ6Asf2ZBSfE5xNvDxt5ASaY7c/i/7OIOSSOk7iU=
X-Received: by 10.176.9.224 with SMTP id e32mr4857888uah.186.1521072877763; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoDpreyWcaLG_bMvEmMk1KvMQEGhXB+Ro+f1BKf3p_DxOA@mail.gmail.com> <4e1ab8ca-e977-7273-358b-3df3670d0ee5@cs.tcd.ie> <D1FFA72D-28B8-4435-B069-5EE1563E26B2@fugue.com> <CALZ3u+Z6DWMwKF6eoDJ2h5ABRGpeYrqZUyesnYhHP5g1d8rQ1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2Xtkjzkvwhmr6ZYvZ+VqjDFnnKM4QvqKVkXvt+WHZ4iJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPsNn2Xtkjzkvwhmr6ZYvZ+VqjDFnnKM4QvqKVkXvt+WHZ4iJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:14:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+aG6n_OaM4VDLiwUVFG5Py0GOPPe5yUoCwBSsVn0Tz5jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043ee33c8e810605676860fd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/S-BndLu9gMKp99B2X8oGhjJyP3Q>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:14:41 -0000

a) Nalini, I haven't posted anything even slightly close to the examples of
offending messages you've just written.

b) Is this the only message of mine that deserves a response?

14 Mar. 2018 г., 19:00 nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>:

> >>One strategy that's very effective for overcoming resistance to bad
>> ideas is to keep pushing the idea until nobody who's resisting it can
>> afford to continue doing so.
>>
>
> >There's a name for that tactics, it's called "consensus by exhaustion".
> (On the recent GNSO meeting this was briefly discussed as an issue within
> ICANN.)
>
>
> Guys, I know it is a lot of fun to talk about how others do not have the
> brains that God gave a termite and that maybe they are even the spawn of
> the devil.
>
> But, let's just use Occam's razor.   Or as I tell my daughter, "if you
> hear hoof beats, it is likely not a zebra, it is a horse".
>
> The simple explanation is that people think they will have serious issues
> with TLS1.3 and actually, TLS1.2 when it is DH only.
>
> Nalini
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 13 Mar. 2018 г., 18:38 Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>:
>>
>>> One strategy that's very effective for overcoming resistance to bad
>>> ideas is to keep pushing the idea until nobody who's resisting it can
>>> afford to continue doing so.
>>>
>>
>> There's a name for that tactics, it's called "consensus by exhaustion".
>> (On the recent GNSO meeting this was briefly discussed as an issue within
>> ICANN.)
>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
>>
> --
> Thanks,
> Nalini Elkins
> President
> Enterprise Data Center Operators
> www.e-dco.com
>
>