[TLS] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-12: (with COMMENT)
David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org> Mon, 02 June 2025 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <davidben@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978072FD5A01 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ru6oOqkxS7pQ for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096282FD59DE for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6020ff8d54bso8392290a12.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1748887246; x=1749492046; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aBxLGLbOoT/VSUN++9LT2tESSQMW+HZFy/ypmn3zaUQ=; b=cqAL+NvuorBy1qqzQ2zudkCgZgtnZ8BVKo9iP2Mba526V08uruT7CzW9PQrgnCnYgs x6BzzpXotI/lJJJBMRP4U5/WQ2TglXSr4AbYsneQRy2ikNmxuUYGH6EEd2iE+T1KLEq4 BV4eZHjG/6lnKjVDQjkTz0wZBQ+SbB2CvGlZA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748887246; x=1749492046; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=aBxLGLbOoT/VSUN++9LT2tESSQMW+HZFy/ypmn3zaUQ=; b=TEETwDxwn/JXTYqLTNbORZjyghteH6m3yZN7gaPJTfhBZSuikGmDBoa03F7lY1NCbg VKFzqmxIVixACqV3LgPRJq/fDDDKBF7N7x/hHfmEN8F5/UsylVenS8um/ZwTeB5R536P XRj2kLpE+BQDhkKASipgLSHo9+qXMvQ+tBUFXNwYPd7pV9OhEEtWtBqXeKxGku6zEdfC 9N1IZ34/1GGfaX0+sijAgmPpNvnm+2pYRBT68lnrl5bh8SZ39rnoctq6djNrZOVeFPtv R3uUJRMXTgNhW9IZgiH+ZF2xnxH3sm4AxwhHbIPOPkeuMySMsfVN3VFgt3qdoS4rXeHm PNWw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUZ7MqPrfE8cbpWqPQfbG/Em0jVCc6Xr0ZO9LpFqcmTU2FKPH/zQGV35h4j+vVdEYYWDG4=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwZpaO241gWsUjQLD6QJjsIfz/wcwmEjQFU786zLZBnGoAgXQrg ox0GgFMAh3KjUDXAqnrDjXraJ/D+yWdq1V/b9Qgw9U2axa+OXHQlTdDP8w6cW4vgswzPgNOKG2C m9wed0kR38nu1KLysd+RlMsQYMijZZmwugFphb3lj4JOhqZvwgoQJePU=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvsSbBQs++mIodDsZYbQBq8zWHiqNzGpywK9dcbkMJY1xZiii7OmVf9SqlRsq0 nDLn+D8O8VVu7lRbDmXVoRffKQ0TJn7ArYRa8Pl/8q5r8allL6Dk+vl3q5YmRJ9j6s3gPMGnkBn 4gCNILSIyznF8hLPh9cqU4BYO2gj7P+cZVZt1wPhcdAcMr945Qexjqczsj3xTdjp/kpSbI9Xsn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFU4wUnaAEevRmE6xg/kG+E1Eqgs0/LpKKJR7n68yG3dcn10+l522vTfESpTOrs/msy27WfAeP8HEt9pfSCQpo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:350c:b0:5fa:f7ee:191f with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-605b796f20amr8597417a12.32.1748887245795; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174705794452.1652135.2918549562183900223@dt-datatracker-58d4498dbd-6gzjf> <CABcZeBPob57wCqciHxG5oV2_FcT-RhO13v9GFBDWSCXmC_bojg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPob57wCqciHxG5oV2_FcT-RhO13v9GFBDWSCXmC_bojg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 14:00:28 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFuxI95lJ_zvlw9kXNdho3vSursiI9O-p6NssexateWvj7RZUJEtgheH3uQ
Message-ID: <CAF8qwaD3Ep3pHkM-zw4qk9czmcGiZ10D+46LjhZB2vCi69fkpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000a8d8106369a8b8d"
Message-ID-Hash: UBTTTWXBETIDROJKDUZXZVGP5PMIWYAN
X-Message-ID-Hash: UBTTTWXBETIDROJKDUZXZVGP5PMIWYAN
X-MailFrom: davidben@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-12: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SGt8_ZB1l0o612RgF-EYPdF2qzk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:14 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > # (nit) 4.2.8: omission and inclusion > > > > OLD: > > For this reason, the omission of a share for group A and inclusion of > > one for group B does not mean that the client prefers B to A. > > > > NEW: > > For this reason, the omission of a share for group A and inclusion of > > one for group B do not mean that the client prefers B to A. > > I'm not sure this is actually correct. I see the argument that this > is plural, but I think there's also an argument that it's a single > act. Let's let the RPC copy edit phase resolve this. > Agreed that it is a single act. We're not talking separately about ClientHellos that omit A and ClientHellos that include B. We're talking about ClientHellos that omit A and include B at the same time, as that's the interesting case. Perhaps this'll make people happy? > For this reason, the inclusion of a share for group B, without one for group A, does not mean that the client prefers B to A. David
- [TLS] Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-i… Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker
- [TLS] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on dra… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on dra… David Benjamin