Re: [TLS] Call for consensus: Removing 0-RTT client auth

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Wed, 18 May 2016 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B3A12D10C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F_H_-q5u_ps5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747BF12D512 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w36so19732663qge.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rGR8upTFh3P1S5LCXA4nN7VT9ryVcc6sVsiPEIgdkKE=; b=zxccOjoFU/BkDlcmGaBMiC6SyZmCphxkp6mx0k7dBjuffYfRnlAk8GMWASPZwxaaC4 V5uxdvh+5cVtlBjJjXotNk2VUJdMmtfjyd0ifTP9IRXMqz8J8ZpzaKQYFpsFfcxVowyp /Gl9qHQgPRKKehqOVdbIKZlxC9oKZ1s4R3Fdts3bt2d7QwVTeUpqs0Yf6jL7n0FGwMI5 oOX3kjyz2PDZWs50BUoCE2t9j4uRX6s/Qz36/AUZQZLKshoA2UBh4x02E1v73WLK14PU fVgK0kOT3qCDMH5WOJExMr9BjYMCK5rBcmJqL25VnDy53LfE6mGUKgX+badmv8YvJ4rL E8+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rGR8upTFh3P1S5LCXA4nN7VT9ryVcc6sVsiPEIgdkKE=; b=bmSJB7vk3QAwUccc97A2L75CKXdMh1NWNEWWz2cvPfNXn9RJVUYVX7Ld/8v1+psyyn 7u+13YI8V5bOb0Ijgw1/Vuucphcv/udbBjeHlN6VN+E8jDjdRmqrJfKTWeFAEUQUR5vm IvsMquc/gKQVl8rTWvpHeVRNOd1kGBuMXK65QKUgyqj63GljCH1sRW3KoPrsqpbpSk5W ARSss+uZwE06RxhWBB5owHs47df5H6y9w/QaNaOnU52O6+QZqNVagXlbYZb15/VXxwqb G1nBY1mabCYkMB0N+zGlvHPzvD2kE1H1LAb4mE+EC/Bqf1QGezrYCFIJE1/oBRmx+iae aRWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWtMyn/+bVliNtSzR5Z+teId5f6JDCmSoKuorv8B86Eg/0FnLAqEcfb8VwMlD1jl2SLUXi6gJOM53FRmA==
X-Received: by 10.140.32.161 with SMTP id h30mr5309791qgh.51.1463545145607; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.175.196 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AABACDA8-6A12-4023-A971-1254CED4893F@sn3rd.com>
References: <AABACDA8-6A12-4023-A971-1254CED4893F@sn3rd.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:18:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoAdhrf3ik_pBO=ffnpu3BVe01WT9vyr5UrykR1oBEAaUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a797c845e8a053316289b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/STzvlk5rC4sklbZcSC5i_-glP4I>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus: Removing 0-RTT client auth
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 04:19:08 -0000

The discussion on the list has not changed the consensus from the IETF 95
meeting, 0-RTT client authentication should be removed from the draft.

Cheers,

J&S

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> To make sure we’ve got a clear way forward coming out of our BA sessions,
> we need to make sure there’s consensus on a couple of outstanding issues.
> So...
>
> It seems that there is a clear consensus not to support 0-RTT client
> authentication in TLS 1.3 at this time.  If you think 0-RTT client
> authentication needs to be supported please indicate so now and provide
> your rationale.
>
> J&S
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>