Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 07 October 2017 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C762132355 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nio-DfCqNF51 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED59413209C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v97FM1TI013636; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 16:25:32 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=lGpPHbufuo0rMNvY9Z6NkQmz2IlPSzCi/aHjM3Qd23U=; b=GxGj91YC4rvKcL6gACvhHBI5LJTLb6l9qbr8zUue0pEdmP0LEmLNQ8glypr3CjgKkyo2 vXPYL3sJWi1KfkO7hk9yoM33Scz0a/cAvDqnDrsTN8T1QWYAfRhEs+g2FRYfd10pRmHC r9fFw0JXMipkjqvodPYEN3APuNq2TxNiH86a/UsIXkcirJqqZWR6Qk/hbZaI4ctwY6uE CWzgVEmE5ptxIOR/so+jk3V78AnsmTItmAzIjS3LqOMnOwDMJ+ms3fmq0xnZml3PVB68 ktUdpy/HKx2Wm3qGwyb36ojMooaSbnHrHzIoea6DcCKyLCpY5Xc5Ffijj1BTmSTX6NDO zw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 ([96.6.114.87]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2depye1e2d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 07 Oct 2017 16:25:31 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v97FKZlx028505; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:25:31 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2det8vgup5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 07 Oct 2017 11:25:30 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 10:25:29 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 10:25:30 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
CC: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues
Thread-Index: AQHTPuAhbOGtBHBWK0qNw6DkAAvXEKLX5dCAgACwfICAAC3SgIAABykAgAAD6oCAAAF1AIAABnAA
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:25:29 +0000
Message-ID: <C7396C83-9F02-4BF8-B490-4EA8DB9798B1@akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBMoW8B78C5UmLqAim4X=jQ8jVRYTP-L7RVnU3AScdFvFw@mail.gmail.com> <EAD84CE1-41A9-40FE-B882-18F077FFD691@akamai.com> <17791E16-1E12-4E8E-A098-31E961C2B2CB@gmail.com> <CAOjisRx9rwtbwBOTB+PegrKim2Q3bDmwbZi6KAu0aFMEaYSxRw@mail.gmail.com> <A6896A64-A0B3-409A-ABC2-1EF1D7DD0E7D@akamai.com> <CAL02cgQc2UriU7EZzpYpdxMrj15fDrfsD3adS0TeqhTe8ZEcBA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBP9sqG6sHEdN1hLj4_gT7qQM9vAnhGussrUwkaFO+gciA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP9sqG6sHEdN1hLj4_gT7qQM9vAnhGussrUwkaFO+gciA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.40.89]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7396C839F024BF8B4904EA8DB9798B1akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-07_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710070217
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-07_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710070217
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SWcZh8avoEiyYOolnibPnkl0frM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:25:35 -0000

> I suggest we not have this debate now. We'll have a lot more data towards the end of the month and we can have an informed discussion then.


That is what I am asking for.  More information so that the entire WG can make an informed decision.  And I was only laying out an option that does not seem to have been considered before.