IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] IPR Disclosure: INEOVATION's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-05

Mohamad Badra <mbadra@gmail.com> Tue, 13 May 2014 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mbadra@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52E11A01CA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DIdf53cSfD0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22e.google.com (mail-vc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7352C1A01C9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id lh14so984022vcb.19 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gq9wK2g/IhOkewQsBP1IzTJQifqpRzr/2i5XKVA102w=; b=haeEI+R8j/TbxvGGxN5dgJVQp3iEpGuMfNPc7f7Us6Wy29S7dNMJJioU4hGWbzjhF/ QKcrVEuDh+ImLYWtsQSvGNq3AEFgKbkQtSRmPVDkT+DI6vZqqakwnBsOHHnENHm3JgAs eeA+CsFSSm/lPIUJGyqGcixLuiWWQPVAn53UpSeM7ERMznARwJy7So9T+euEqaFSGQQM cOBbod+Dvh9+678ydkOMt6BP6WZ0HR030+OiSJBRLnuoCHFf6wpIjSDsaosh/Ae7DhmM oMnl9d1GyKFVFQXbqTArGAT3MwTtfcNouj8FGQTnVaJubf9jDrrWdb36YCZd9O755LOC gO3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.126.4 with SMTP id mu4mr31012236veb.0.1400005253937; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.78.74 with HTTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 11:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0A5F4392-1553-4F7E-BD72-D1F44B8E83A3@gmail.com>
References: <20140512210747.10675.45300.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53713CDE.1070308@cs.tcd.ie> <0A5F4392-1553-4F7E-BD72-D1F44B8E83A3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:20:53 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOhHAXzM8XNMr6zLwwD_16fKy_4yjTNKcagS-1RUUedxUA2vqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mohamad Badra <mbadra@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6700afd840bb04f94c1ff2"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SWvowhwDjDaS31rpXmiJzY33zJE
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] IPR Disclosure: INEOVATION's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-05
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:21:04 -0000

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On May 13, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
>
> After the draft was placed in the RFC editor's queue we got
> > a heads-up that this might be coming so I asked the RFC editor
> > to hold publication for a bit hoping we'd find out more which
> > we now have.
> >
> > So if the WG wanted to make some change to the document,
> > that is still possible. If the WG are happy to go ahead then
> > I can ask the RFC editor to proceed as normal.
>
> IANAL, but that patent seems to be about multiplexing multiple
> applications within a single session, so more like SSL-VPN than just TLS.
> In fact the patent talks about VPNs in the description part.
>
> More specifically, all the application negotiation in the patent happens
> in application data records, not handshake records. So it's multiplexing at
> the application layer, vs selection at the handshake. Doesn't seem to me
> that it applies.
>
>
The application negotiation is done by using a TLS extension, in which the
client send a list of application names and the server replies with the
selected application (See Fig. 2 in the patent and the description text
[0022]).
Best regards,
Badra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email