[TLS] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-12: (with COMMENT)
Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 27 May 2025 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.226] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CF12D57A6C; Tue, 27 May 2025 07:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.40.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174835599089.1711298.1085676501589117194@dt-datatracker-59b84fc74f-84jsl>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 07:26:30 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: PI73U6TVUVWYKP5N4ZONHXRMX46U3VE2
X-Message-ID-Hash: PI73U6TVUVWYKP5N4ZONHXRMX46U3VE2
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Subject: [TLS] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-12: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SYAVgjVhmc4AWMaeNdsIgHG0TXc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Ben Schwartz for their secdir review. Section 4: Is there a note to be added to 'connection_id'? (just looks a little weird to have notes for the other three) Section 9: Why is 'none' recommended 'Y' (it seems like this should be D)? And what is the difference between 'none' and 'intrinsic'?
- [TLS] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls… Deb Cooley via Datatracker
- [TLS] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf… Sean Turner
- [TLS] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf… Deb Cooley
- [TLS] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf… Sean Turner