Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF091D3148B for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:05:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hcldar1PAG-e for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901D71D31484 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e6e50418da6so6771405276.3 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1744826702; x=1745431502; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e4cUk01Thi3SQHyeb+mXOp/iD2I7P1iibBTUNLqHyKg=; b=ju+Aa0+N531s4VjLEXk+1FFUjnNn2JHLO00ohyBgEcSQrxB2VVvAsSWLH2gUfUuKHL mvIKMOP3CWncFhS9+LfavlLKJtFE1z6Q8lK+W2wI+2WLH+GzACLCnhT8zkmp7Q3zpVgM 4n/R7JR+iKuyBjzc3bDhvg01n91Q8Ya4lPnXpjzJc1zj8ELW16o8cB1jb76mmFBXCpQ9 Y68gLzM4y7TpdTdhskcEiBpekstaFFN9XvvShXRxIroKVgjEXCGWM4R8yAejmalrFQBd 6GRqGea+nJFK76AQdBiw9hd6u+xrhDcvbfm1ST/oWteBTbERW55BZaM3I1VwSAdZZH3j l1uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744826702; x=1745431502; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=e4cUk01Thi3SQHyeb+mXOp/iD2I7P1iibBTUNLqHyKg=; b=ecn8rbAAkaigRuEBh5yV8ahdwQVmuWktzFqa2m3gJ0bAfDbIiqt2MGm4x36za2iFXZ eAJ6sct8jDLhZ5eVYX+oknoh3FJ/EGUgWy+kYAyf2e6/Y5cqRYBxUmCDLo/VIS4LHrgC LFqtUt7FlFk8MMcOU9Bz28BRZeFjMOPgvjrG0Pw1pP2tyVAFW1w0VZrAhHIotuUzjLj9 0cAXphZwpkpHjSy5Co6SynOqoS/qPpdDQk5GtSPKzZ6F8+Ws8TTmJyAam6G4uUzOd/BU SBrDJHuyMURo3O9aSHbH1jtcLnvUSHVGsjTuhmfQOMlgzl/XUcDSRabPf/uCNocxbVA3 MEmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzd1eO1ez+eTH9FOjWMEbthQpYVp2lGTOGnVEifohFRUo23GUMs ji043lXs2EKxtumAo+Le+yyF/pH0PHURkPmX+m+4SUHLgY2ml8OMcvF/HLQx+Bcfb+3otKD4+qZ 52RoeiysVr2fMbmgiN0fPTjC5Z8l46R73uwTXrg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctrS+teuCNzAzQvKdw4KYLs17OkXIvHluKcJJVI12mlwl+M4glys3+CIIRTwT4 dv7EDdzKyoa6YzvN8XNTRD9e6hZtUP3RydLA4dUenL1PJYujElyUS+FVnNRB3nUUNpEx6lbTGsq 5765jEhwvI0aBzu+jH1x92/KiB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGqat++YsfMr/jZb3di9CAAW5XBbXzJka6KzXyOgFiMQKuq63rLrmnxuAgzUXOGqLuIGCyEtjjEb0R7kbas0AQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1a44:b0:e6d:ec5e:b5ed with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e727593e79bmr4370444276.21.1744826701925; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <174482144256.1417643.12778721014959621161@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg> In-Reply-To: From: Eric Rescorla Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:04:25 -0700 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUFc4HPG6-1Ucaq0GboxMMJIs5FJh9Qy_ZTJzvrolNBV_YwgnxjKPluJ-Qc Message-ID: To: Loganaden Velvindron Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c36aba0632e91f8f" Message-ID-Hash: 7KTZQDVPC7H6VRVE2BKOL4I3ULGNSYY5 X-Message-ID-Hash: 7KTZQDVPC7H6VRVE2BKOL4I3ULGNSYY5 X-MailFrom: ekr@rtfm.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTLS=5D_Re=3A_I-D_Action=3A_draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00=2Etxt?= List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000c36aba0632e91f8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:57=E2=80=AFAM Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 20:38, wrote: > > > > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.txt is now available. It is a > work item > > of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF. > > > > Title: ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 > > Author: Deirdre Connolly > > Name: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.txt > > Pages: 11 > > Dates: 2025-04-16 > > > > Abstract: > > > > This memo defines ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024 as a > > standalone NamedGroups for use in TLS 1.3 to achieve post-quantum ke= y > > agreement. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.html > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > > > > Will the authors consider a section 6.4 on risks involved with > lattice-based structures ? > I like what Simon Josefsson used in one of his drafts: > "new research findings may be published at any time that may warrant > implementation reconsiderations". > This seems like it would apply to basically every RFC specifying a security protocol, so I'm not really in favor of that. I wouldn't be opposed to some lattice-specific thing if the WG (or more likely, CFRG) thought that was appropriate. -Ekr > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org > --000000000000c36aba0632e91f8f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Apr 16,= 2025 at 10:57=E2=80=AFAM Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 20:38, <internet-drafts@ietf= .org> wrote:
>
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.txt is now available. It is a w= ork item
> of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF.
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Title:=C2=A0 =C2=A0ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for = TLS 1.3
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Author:=C2=A0 Deirdre Connolly
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Name:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.txt
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pages:=C2=A0 =C2=A011
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Dates:=C2=A0 =C2=A02025-04-16
>
> Abstract:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 This memo defines ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024= as a
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 standalone NamedGroups for use in TLS 1.3 to achieve post= -quantum key
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 agreement.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie= tf-tls-mlkem/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/dra= ft-ietf-tls-mlkem-00.html
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>

Will the authors consider a section 6.4 on risks involved with
lattice-based structures ?
I like what Simon Josefsson used in one of his drafts:
"new research findings may be published at any time that may warrant implementation reconsiderations".

= This seems like it would apply to basically every RFC specifying a security=
protocol, so I'm not really in favor of that. I wouldn't= be opposed to some
lattice-specific thing if the WG (or more lik= ely, CFRG) thought that was
appropriate.

-Ekr


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@i= etf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
--000000000000c36aba0632e91f8f--