Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh

Sean Turner <> Tue, 17 December 2019 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323EB120D79 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Iu0E5Ow4AjH for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30410120883 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 21so6574040qky.4 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=rhinhTQFdjq0KJQWUe6fRqNSI1mXz+oR4eokczd8ChA=; b=LEtQN9nMoHRp+yuVHeD1ZDtVQ0mWxBXlv7qKplytb6BLS+55ILB+OOvnd2vjZ4dALC 9t+fbbcMd6HpXtjCLQDZt07cZPY8gXw8dRVPRnrYKMsP1W4wHcOzeagji+r4JtifS5Kg ZqKLoWI7wJ6lPuKpG8v5CK168riJOTWv1nvr4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=rhinhTQFdjq0KJQWUe6fRqNSI1mXz+oR4eokczd8ChA=; b=T/fVh9oykgb5ltlfwcLvK5cIZ58Wwfa1t+vv6Q2q9y1XdfAhWwERGgCdEg2LNel2HH +WQDiK158K/+EYpIr1JML/hXr5rjtBpdOnuD3DByv5ID+h46tCTm78HdSYLYLe1niJSb YyToTTj7KC9XSMyzDZn+vVJbS/4hHzAAHLJ/3s/hWPraOZC6YYmDNwJAavYW54WMf7w1 h6V/uyh4LMyUG6CH5TjLhuvyagVB3w+6JiBgN7xeV24VQmwJ8tMeA6RL/J+eJgFLGDe+ IscMFep4Ij3epiI9IlnYAY6BG4ttB5LTjr1eCerq6iunYNqabXrruDWuHe832unuA868 oW2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQikipcQ7A7fGyxC3N1+a0lC4ghq7vP9aa0vjtmiCHD6eYUtAD 7uytR4mcGYgYM4sYoXysnkG2cKhb2Ts=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzt3/niZn81dW/V+hCxMJSoXYIrnVqiu7X0XoJqTJ+ExJMFvyCmA1t1U84MYai78RQiwiulBA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b19:: with SMTP id t25mr7126658qkg.82.1576612302105; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sn3rd.lan ([]) by with ESMTPSA id f42sm8502379qta.0.2019. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:51:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Turner <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:51:41 -0500
References: <>
To: TLS List <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:51:49 -0000

The adoption call ended on Friday.  There is support for adopting and working on this draft as a WG item. Most of the support was received during the WG session at IETF 106, but there was additional support provided on the list.

NOTE: Technically, we will formally adopt this draft once (i.e., push the buttons in the datatracker) the WG re-charter process completes successfully.


Chris, Joe, and Sean

> On Nov 21, 2019, at 17:28, Sean Turner <> wrote:
> At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman Key Establishment" for TLS 1.3 [0] as a WG item.  To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why).
> : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions.  We would have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is progressing out of the WG.
> Thanks,
> Joe and Sean
> [0]