Re: [TLS] draft-mcgrew-aead-aes-cbc-hmac-sha2 can't be used as TLS 1.2 AEAD ciphers

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1D811E83C2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGF05Mu6TdTb for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC7911E8102 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o6so1551391oag.27 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=bg+YcSMDnES0Hj7xJPeWm5lalUnFSLffxpEzWCRHwcs=; b=poD/LbATBedXLoTq0bqX22dVp+S5rQcVPWSVV89T+a3WX7c3wIuAbHrlBLIWCBRU3A bdqu83eZ+2inA26eNlf581Y/gp7QPFRTwSn69tkFz4NOa9Lyo76On2+EIf/PRNk5VNFR IfU1k7g4EJePKupXQ6t/Js3r2BSIwqbGKHKHw9wT37znCMxIdDg8gRdj4AVV4yMXtTx+ ABoOxLMfxC8lJ+fTlFbz0HzwN5F/2jsFZviYYI+FnqMGgkHVbU1b+Jrc149B9y8iSikq Rix1HA4of3D9WnVf+1K2lVDO1LGBknKIqrFL56dfwZv02w8ywatFQjimaoJCmuiU/QhV fGxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bg+YcSMDnES0Hj7xJPeWm5lalUnFSLffxpEzWCRHwcs=; b=Y/0wGvlji5O66BU2qncwCMUSRngYXaIIg+hvaRf0fn+c8nN+02IFBm3+RHKuu0yTMh f5OXnDP/zxHrdKcSKRFxKc7Aiexzih5C3kERQdaQ3he6kqDe2N3hRRTeXywOVELQAnFD gLqfV53nQskR1JqVKr1KJ00ZcO/2gALO8O0Enyyj9+quUNENmDMu86H+QsPM2DNo6xM2 hM7/InGM21H1UzyKtBHKCe0Kdr46j/w33rzCU+M06YnglS/Ddm4Sa3xJVl2y9muaop21 9x97Jl+ncw57yD2FHr4Z9FZCWcp6bu2JghDG2B2d/gSP8sFmxNXzGFtgCVlP+sS4FbU5 jUHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlr/+L9RTdB4lm0T1zdBYrKntgusp/L7yL7bJh+oQtUj7hVzHSiLyHUKLItHFvuvAUDi47hNOEZKIu3MzY2KgJEc1Qzh0ejfDwu08PqJuKEBYoRwLDgGUqCIUdbx6WHBK2C9FnKyt3tKKfQsQj3McKGKFdM+fwLFyZFdPob+er9qC8vMCkqPNkh+dlGcVMGbCxozKu8
X-Received: by 10.50.130.65 with SMTP id oc1mr5364230igb.49.1377108162534; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.162.74 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALTJjxEjN04jfCb=mjo1ZWPvgX_sw0Dw6v+AMPKdXp=9BbCxow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALTJjxEjN04jfCb=mjo1ZWPvgX_sw0Dw6v+AMPKdXp=9BbCxow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:02:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLwHOaFU8kYQ+hqT+3J47yMXE4LxkG=GDyPdZFmfGQ+n-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: foleyj@cisco.com, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-mcgrew-aead-aes-cbc-hmac-sha2 can't be used as TLS 1.2 AEAD ciphers
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:02:46 -0000

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com> wrote:
> Is this a known problem with TLS 1.2 AEAD ciphers?

I hit the same issue while planning to move OpenSSL's TLS CBC decoding
into EVP (a lower-layer of OpenSSL). I couldn't figure out a way
around it and gave up.


Cheers

AGL