Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed (Martin Rex) Mon, 18 November 2013 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219F1AE129 for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:32:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.652
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HpiBLzCIxNQZ for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1131AE128 for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:32:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from by (26) with ESMTP id rAIJW7RJ017517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:32:07 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:32:07 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <>
From: (Martin Rex)
X-SAP: out
Subject: Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:32:18 -0000

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Would be interesting to hear from someone working for Mozilla (like Ekr, 
> our TLS WG chair) why things are progressing so slowly and what exactly 
> their problem is.

The lack of real value in TLSv1.1, the additional weaknesses of TLSv1.2,
and the interoperability problem of sending ClientHello.client_version
with a value higher than { 0x03, 0x01 }.

Did any browser try to ship TLSv1.1 or TLSv1.2 without including
a reconnect fallback facility?  How many browsers did reconnect fallbacks
prior to using TLSv1.1 or TLSv1.2?

The reasons for TLSv1.1/TLSv1.2 not deploying is not very much different
from why IPv6 is not deploying.  Huge complexity and negligible value.