Re: [TLS] Proposed Change to Certificate message (#654)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 06 October 2016 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8149012945D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fr81IWjT6BBs for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483B11293F5 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n189so5692067qke.0 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sdzh1okFGvRqLrFpZ73mTFv+5PnEk4oliCQnaEMBq6w=; b=f8SF3lBTHodRIi4lbf5d+MW+jZ7WJGEw/mgEA0hQ7c+5W+oGkERfr9QY5ffkZzckd/ uS4uIhyBGMqIXkGZFvqbbP3viEVpi/OdvR9toC8bJDBFGS+fQDq52xliyOp5JizZ/GCZ COgCx6yteueJq0JKphafKG28l62zLpugjwHUGOsz0TmC3Y2hM46Ewbtt7RlItzLyTw6Q JyD7Uun8XA4WgpEY4fg0wC+V/SYSIE2IM6voH6TquZmwBXWoR3Mu0DTOVF26EisdHt7/ w/xUA/Mw+fIeDbzrzm3sc/v79Hhr7HHLdxr8T3d4u2soetJ8Ti15jqikRflwGqpFuZ7r 2o1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sdzh1okFGvRqLrFpZ73mTFv+5PnEk4oliCQnaEMBq6w=; b=TB1/Z6PKSeFj3nmRuS2EHHxSCN9NesKnCqLMZgc2jOGXIysy0n/DAD4fgX2Io7ckvL zNp02sPdpqbJ0KQzVBT5Si5h5U6bRGZgE4svBVquNeC02TZ4t3jbrTYXuWHzGjZaZg20 wpzMhSWSLkfw5dO1+NpWtFyqfPuvPu31pFRJh7v4rM7ZsDUPky9kVj4IGcF/P3wVejse gml0JKGQeGYUd0x+j9YGWaA/TueC/rX4XcpwxsIWy0zDVxLwZT7PqYaCEMHW10b+5K+J yL3I6MsakFmJoJjHEW+tzeS6TzHzD11INvm7oaj5XY/NTqVG9xgovMRx/DlbyFuJneEm d3Dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlzwzk41xcAKjGT1Lyt/OAHOLc832ij6hgEIpEVtzOtzuSHC48dShtibedc5tlWb5I2eRnZ2UNcgA4nQw==
X-Received: by 10.55.102.78 with SMTP id a75mr12436476qkc.193.1475722774422; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.22.146 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161005194028.GA26154@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CAOjisRyDx0Wa5tcFT3gN496jhf-AjLfDH4JNN+w70r8jBsxt5g@mail.gmail.com> <F157C00C-921E-48AB-BAB7-C8CA882D1A05@sn3rd.com> <20161005194028.GA26154@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 13:59:33 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXsytcfEatQVaz=Yi_E=HvTJT9b-aPafvD5BSUeboCp4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/TQt8q8Ku--mf911vPG3DXIJE88o>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed Change to Certificate message (#654)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 02:59:36 -0000

On 6 October 2016 at 06:40, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>; wrote:
> The only issue that comes to mind is where extensions that are specific
> to the certificate chain instead to the certificate go.

Let's keep it simple.  I would put these on the EE cert.  That is the
entry that has the most chance of being looked at.