Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt
Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Mon, 28 August 2006 22:41 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpnW-0003ey-73; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:41:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpnU-0003em-KZ for tls@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:41:36 -0400
Received: from raman.networkresonance.com ([198.144.196.3]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpnT-0008S8-Ap for tls@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:41:36 -0400
Received: by raman.networkresonance.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6F12A1E8C1C; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt
References: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE502580384@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060828153142.06aa3fd0@qualcomm.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:41:34 -0700
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060828153142.06aa3fd0@qualcomm.com> (Lakshminath Dondeti's message of "Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:36:35 -0700")
Message-ID: <86psekcwkh.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de, tls@ietf.org, hartmans-ietf@mit.edu
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: EKR <ekr@networkresonance.com>
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com> writes: > After a quick look at the documents in consideration, I am thinking > something like an IKEv2 PRF+ might also work. > > Each time an instance draws on the key material there would be a new > key. Would that work? Well, the issue isn't really which PRF to use. Given that TLS has one and that it's got the ability generate disjoint keys from the same underlying entropy, that's kind of the obvious one to use. that's kind of a no-brainer. The issue is the layer violation and making sure that each side gets the same (unique) key even if multiple other protocols are trying to get keys out of TLS this way... -Ekr _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Michael Tuexen
- RE: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- [TLS] Re: draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Sam Hartman
- Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Michael Tuexen
- RE: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [TLS] draft-tuexen-dtls-for-sctp-00.txt Eric Rescorla