Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-hoffman-tls-additional-random-ext (Additional Random

"Kemp, David P." <> Tue, 27 April 2010 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3EF3A69B3; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.556, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLDqu2w067Tj; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44803A69AD; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:50:23 -0400
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Last Call: draft-hoffman-tls-additional-random-ext (Additional Random
Thread-Index: Acrl8/jFkiDlGQ3jT9+3taaIsYVHpAAEtodA
References: <> <>
From: "Kemp, David P." <>
To: "Dean Anderson" <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2010 12:51:33.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D903860:01CAE608]
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-hoffman-tls-additional-random-ext (Additional Random
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:51:01 -0000

I'm not sure why an entropy pool would not be considered "truly random"
by any of the three criteria you cited.  If there is insufficient
physically-generated entropy (such as on an appliance with no hard
drives, no user timing input, and all other sources observable or
predictable) then the process is not applicable - it cannot create
entropy by magic.

But by what criteria would it fail to be truly random (albeit at a much
lower rate than dedicated hardware) on an uncompromised user desktop?


-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Anderson [] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:25 AM
To: Kemp, David P.
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-hoffman-tls-additional-random-ext
(Additional Random


The link you cite above is an example of the extra hardware that most
people don't have.


The link you cite above isn't a truly random number generator.


Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?         faster, more reliable, better service
617 256 5494