Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with DISCUSS)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 18 May 2015 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A981AC41A; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.034
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N9hpjNn821JD; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C3B1AC3FE; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CECA778090; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=BrbX3lRptpDfL9 QGV1hWmmDodic=; b=iJMboh6bBro422MxuTxW5DHrLs3QI61/NIK952brI6Aj0f 4Qxrt4UNEEOwX6FyjtiB55Q7lXUhPR6Dse8nG4QfiViU7LUgB2q3y9EoReEuJYdS VsMtDmIyGTVy3qhe3VxEC6TCjZyB5zVsestVYWfk+7EuJ4muOgHQ1DpR561og=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E93F0778088; Mon, 18 May 2015 08:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:56:25 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150518155624.GK7287@localhost>
References: <20150509225248.21800.83581.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55546240.3010902@cs.tcd.ie> <FBCB2F18-4975-45EE-9550-5D77450AB5FE@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FBCB2F18-4975-45EE-9550-5D77450AB5FE@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/TlWNGu4vZ51YyLEvmvqWIT6mgnk>
Cc: tls-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-session-hash.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-session-hash.ad@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-tls-session-hash@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:56:31 -0000

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Karthikeyan Bhargavan wrote:
> The session-hash draft has roughly the same impact as RFC5746, which says:
> "Updates: 5246, 4366, 4347, 4346, 2246"

+1 to updating RFC5246 and related.

> We would be happy to add this list or a subset.
> 
> Other RFCs affected by the current proposal are: rfc5929, rfc5705, rfc5746.
> 
> Should we note these in any way, other than as Informative References?

RFC5929 is affected in this way: by the effective addition of a security
consideration when used without the session hash extension.  So yes,
RFC5929 should be updated even though its channel binding definitions
won't change.

Nico
--