[TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 05 November 2024 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ABBC1D4A70 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:01:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEQ4qK19zU6P for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0A1C1D52F0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4A570Ggm007580; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:01:15 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= content-id:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s= jan2016.eng; bh=FSwqos/KZR5WzywcQYrvxB5Kq7zDhNQ1MNcV9l0N5ZY=; b= neNFgy98q/L1EGlDgQyHAaEXoZzAnKLsfE2oOslF6Do2lfOodVUe0aj9tTnkpfEq S2Cf2VqjFuLcRKTuHF/qNQAnT+IdTVdH7hRz0zvxRsLu5k4ld3essOFMF0mtsAHI eUNRijbZs8sKJfCWTRjqDor3G+CjS/qGE1OKQIzqUtkdjLljih4hgCTQjLtfyGoF YVrUmPmJffKjFBgyKxi6oVPAH/4OZne73NRC0nI3BgyClHv6cckeLGA6kiAR3flX P8DWPZgCk8TbbTWF3AARAlAT6i0xxzhK05DtEPBPNoxLpCur50HK/ZX2+zcHzxCN c/8difftIWAepgSCshYlqQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42ncx6ek8b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:01:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4A5HNZ1U030374; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:01:14 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.200]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42nfdw209w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:01:14 -0500
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:01:13 -0600
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:01:13 -0800
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support
Thread-Index: AQHbL59XjX+E6rC0OkC4Mzy9HBxaEbKpkQYA
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:01:13 +0000
Message-ID: <231D5F24-E1AE-4F7C-9860-F6B0FF79D6FF@akamai.com>
References: <278163DF-0CB8-472F-84CB-0B8236FEC7C1@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <278163DF-0CB8-472F-84CB-0B8236FEC7C1@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.90.24102719
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EC3E5D42A8A2A14680AE25D94A87E0BA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-11-05_06,2024-11-05_01,2024-09-30_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=465 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2411050145
X-Proofpoint-GUID: rqpzr20WXuxLwKoJetjPJuPP0uQVz02a
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rqpzr20WXuxLwKoJetjPJuPP0uQVz02a
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=308 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2411050146
Message-ID-Hash: 5OISTYD3P2MEBU3W62DIFX7GQ4VLJ6S4
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5OISTYD3P2MEBU3W62DIFX7GQ4VLJ6S4
X-MailFrom: rsalz@akamai.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/U7AJ2saD83HmWC99MhQ28pVYbCc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

I strongly support adoption.

I do not understand why anyone would be opposed to the IETF making deployment recommendations. I can understand why someone might be bothered by the impliciation that *THIS ONE WAY* is the only way to get long-term support, especially if it's seen to contradict our encouragement of TLS 1.3. But that is an editorial issue that can be easily fixed.

I would like to see this adopted, a short change cycle, and then advanced in the same cluster with our TLS 1.2 is frozen document.