Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567A3120727 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 17:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-IeTbQ-Yn9n for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 17:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1CE41201FA for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2018 17:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t27-v6so29997591oij.9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 May 2018 17:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IhfNAjuitk4S0j+TkGWPYyMZjRSUcKQMZgotFXmeuz4=; b=ntHIQ5nSoosbjtoEZxcVoQzrBUGEabQ2X6bOi/JMru6pP80eKVwc1aWBnpVk0JMOXO xRajPn54Ao0RJvruhovzDl5Nx7OL6OdOrd9nnFumuXFtv13DHeQCZnmCWRJ7s7W1IiZb sQFT856gVqNrDF/aX8yM4hzIZ2wdugr1xKyozOCgHG75/f/rZNUuehSbUU14g80FGyZM TlrXg0OFCemI2i+ykkKVz1ZwWjOMmy0xHeoHD6TZBgOLql4Bv8SKuQcpJYbSo/8/vLi+ daayNsp2wUmDm1IZUkc347FFFsVJWFeBMy9TxynGH8ZO38ZsbaXtzJtqD3pkWzajssVH iDhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IhfNAjuitk4S0j+TkGWPYyMZjRSUcKQMZgotFXmeuz4=; b=Ry9nTt2J2hWQZjS9/N9yR40hLVp6hhYKPBVpt+/wyuJdZSBIB3FJwR10otleFgAjHg jMAEfthEKRLHfED1N1EDt/fYlMowhl6k15bxr81dVvqyHY9S+Poo0+Fb43AQoiVbf7KE IaZy0PukzY4txK8Drl8pfWGEkIdjYArC94IYgIuCiVwG9htg7fpAhuL9WvDpyl4GmsBE prQuUVT/6MrB7nCW0tH9aYDzphcfMeUzG9MqsiJ5BG0NPfw3foTzNrYRXuEThGniJxLa 6UtWsi/mIeSNBs78JkreawQ19AwI1b6e/rTjboQ21GlinusLUpQ/VmOz4iglA13LAwi7 pEgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAuoXohUI3yi6iEv7nqE4a+WiSaI7IIjPpAHOIfgkGIcXCbdp40 cc1xEwmJBjRjCOMwQwPRZsoQgyeYt+WNkMWenP1aRA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoRIwz4h6PED0c6/Nr+KGfP1jl1U2eziElyp6/jITy/zEvUB6vI3uWpLkV01actifE2Atg9+PRAVJ1oYrNMnYw=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5bc5:: with SMTP id p188-v6mr25474001oib.295.1525825862941; Tue, 08 May 2018 17:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5F30CC9E-EFFC-4A36-801F-A17B9DDF85E0@sn3rd.com> <CE4D387B-A4E8-425D-8FC5-7706C1D6307F@sn3rd.com> <1334EA4C-9432-49E4-9DC4-DEEDF1C3C0AF@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <1334EA4C-9432-49E4-9DC4-DEEDF1C3C0AF@akamai.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 00:30:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW3FKfuGqa8iaaWA9SVz7BLVOwLAD+d7NsdftgQN9tEVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/UGJPOp7hUpfoZsea9dA1OZaw_yw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 00:31:05 -0000

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:56 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> I dislike standard, and am fine with Informational or BCP.

Agree regarding standard.

I don't understand why BCP would be used for this.  Besides, we probably
don't want to enshrine some of the choices we made in NSS as "best
practice".  I'm not saying that those choices aren't defensible, but that
might be going too far.