Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

[Artyom Gavrichenkov <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I've read all that through, and I've been in Prague, and I still feel
that the problem statement lacks some clarification.

This is, by the way, the reason draft-fenter is published; who would need
that if the reasons all this visibility thing is proposed would have been
transparent for anyone?

вт, 13 мар. 2018 г., 13:39 Sean Turner <[e-mail]>:

>
>
> > On Mar 13, 2018, at 16:31, Artyom Gavrichenkov <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nalini,
> >
> > вт, 13 мар. 2018 г., 11:59 nalini elkins <[e-mail]>:
> > The TLS working group has been concentrating on making the Internet
> secure for the individual user.    We feel that there is also an underlying
> motivation to help the underdog and protect the political dissident.
> >
> > This isn't about dissidents, this is all about the proper design.
> >
> > This ID helps explain the situation and subsequent need.  If you haven’t
> had a chance to read it yet, please try to do it before the London meeting.
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fenter-tls-decryption/
> >
> > I've read this document and have already proposed spawning a separate
> thread discussing that before we'll land in London. Probably even before
> the agenda will be confirmed. Or even better, discussing draft-fenter there
> instead of draft-rhrd.
> >
> > IMO draft-fenter is much more important, because it is a problem
> statement, and it's better to settle on a problem statement before
> discussing solution which is "tls visibility". And, for me, personally, the
> problem statement in draft-fenter is not convincing.
>
> I meant to answer your question: draft-fenter is referred to in Russ’s
> slides it’s not specifically on the agenda.  The chairs have seen the
> slides you haven’t yet (Russ gets a gold start for submitting slides early).
>
> This is not the first time the topic (both the motivations and solutions)
> has been discussed.  This time tracks back to IETF 97.  You can find the
> presentation somewhere on the TLS row:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda.html
> There was also some discussion in Prague, which can found somewhere near
> the TLS row at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/proceedings
>
> There have also been hundreds of message related to this topic that you
> can search for on the list to get a sense (use the search tool with
> something like “datacenter" OR "Data Center" OR draft-green OR RHRD OR
> draft-rhrd OR "Industry Concerns"):
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=tls
>
> I hope that folks who come to the session will take the time to review the
> previous discussion.
>
> spt
>
>