Re: [TLS] Moving SHA-1 signature schemes to not recommended in draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 25 June 2020 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B593A097F; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 05:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IP_hKSUgBQz; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 05:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1530A3A097D; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 05:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05PCYKV3016515; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:35:25 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=s2rE3vAEsSfy/bRgcb9Z9P3d/g4KLtCEfc5ZXn7aLHs=; b=JE5sjXr9PAMrUWqKYtCvCdgFYo5vnqIFjuK4bZgTlL7Sdaj5GZkrhe+tpt2rPjqBjk3t oX6Bst3DZHMBKNVFeZEKPakBoUDJd++iQ+/5GJWaJy6WL5i0pckLKBTMDSeN4gyVMOag Xjv5sKoIzTyafKTiX2YVpbdSvvtMH0fDo+tqorutQtxU7btJa1c5SkK7upshtp8Buf5f 0pqDQL6WDvRpiOzi4iuaIoN7HB44mS8imKrZc9m0obIXLfGgeaJ8cFhy1oFDIJesajt9 TZgJG9+g0S4QSW1tzyySe74x6j3FiL6NKA6IzlOzd+N5xKa387QlBQzYDZeGgmsk+zs6 /A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31uus697dv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:35:25 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05PCKjpf011754; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:35:24 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.112]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 31uus99gnp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:35:24 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:35:23 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:35:23 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
CC: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Moving SHA-1 signature schemes to not recommended in draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
Thread-Index: AQHWSq8CBJsJUNb3U0+Rw4Vr/2/hRqjpVZQA
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:35:22 +0000
Message-ID: <49C2B577-FD06-44E7-A6E1-6F74E2AB85A9@akamai.com>
References: <CAOgPGoAj-Pf4jWKuZuNS=Dh0V3WV9e5cHbQcFVBnmxd=93AebQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoAj-Pf4jWKuZuNS=Dh0V3WV9e5cHbQcFVBnmxd=93AebQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.116.32]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_49C2B577FD0644E7A6E16F74E2AB85A9akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-25_05:2020-06-25, 2020-06-25 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=688 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006250078
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-25_08:2020-06-25, 2020-06-25 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=659 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006250080
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/UY6pcdz3rMMPWNKjQ_-ZIRBk37Y>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Moving SHA-1 signature schemes to not recommended in draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:36:28 -0000

  *   I submitted a PR [1] for draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate to move the recommended IANA registry entries for  rsa_pkcs1_sha1 and ecdsa_sha1 in the Signature Scheme registry from Y to N.   This change can be incorporated with any updates from the AD review.

Yes yes yes.

Or no no no?

I think it is remove the “Y” and leave blank, right?