Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

I have no particular position about this draft but
am curious about 2 things:

#1 I don't get why it's not possible for postfix to
determine the best way to manage tickets based on the
destination port to which the ClientHello is sent. I
totally get why that won't solve 100% of cases, but it
would surely solve a huge percentage? Apologies if an
answer was already posted as part of this v. long
thread.

#2 I don't get why Viktor's request for special handling
for value 255 is a real problem for anyone. We have
another thread today envisaging 2040 extensions flags,
so I really have a hard time seeing what here justifies
rejecting Viktor's argument. FWIW, this thread has not
provided me with an obvious answer to #2 other than "not-
invented-here." I'm not sure that declaring things in the
rough where the only identifiable issue is NIH is the
overall best outcome, longer term.

Cheers,
S.