Re: [TLS] Selfie attack was Re: Distinguishing between external/resumption PSKs

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 24 September 2019 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FD4120865 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.864
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fCG2Yr5XmYB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64439120882 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.90.18.223] (unknown [69.94.58.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 477892B2E44 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <964aab95-1a42-df82-e8e4-cf7ee15ba0f8@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:59:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: IETF TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <1EA25F47-B555-4FFD-BE70-EA568BDB73A7@dukhovni.org>
References: <CY4PR1101MB227834A5DF828F000C6D1144DB890@CY4PR1101MB2278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CACykbs2qp0EDa3pGfFpQY6rgruJD1f-6mZ_B5KF8kBkrXD9caw@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR1101MB227871FEF520A88CF65BADF6DB890@CY4PR1101MB2278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <964aab95-1a42-df82-e8e4-cf7ee15ba0f8@ericsson.com>
To: IETF TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VF0wV84x0otoG6hXJPiRtuWh_R8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Selfie attack was Re: Distinguishing between external/resumption PSKs
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:59:15 -0000


> On Sep 23, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> On the topic of external PSKs in TLS 1.3, I found a publication on the 
> Selfie attack: https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/347

If I not missing something, eeels like simple misconfiguration.
How is this different from, say, using the same wildcard certificate
on both nodes?

-- 
	Viktor.