Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F49CFE2C035 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:56:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1781024211; bh=jI+/gSuSe2iU+P+nI+hoFLKhmtDMVjFPIAs/MIJQ+PA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=bTA7pHG0X2Jpniaacdg3VzJAXMhaYct0jAho9TFK6Vza6Hj+OP2lJnhczArJYftBj fXbeoJs3Nj7OkEmvcfcYsE0eHjTQn+lLswUSN0CupFOYIm/4AyXeyF8Muringw7Xwj jjC3pHisO8F1BwIS68fwBUh2oDNOdwBslzyY8FgY= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=welho.com Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lFkpis-9OIZ2 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.dnamail.fi (sender001.dnamail.fi [83.102.40.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FF1FE2BD4B for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.dnamail.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882792113903 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:55:44 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at smtp.dnamail.fi Received: from smtp.dnamail.fi ([83.102.40.178]) by localhost (dmail-psmtp01.s.dnaip.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAD7MkFAFtTR for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:55:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from LK-Perkele-VII2 (87-92-117-27.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.92.117.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hliusvaa@dnamail.internal) by smtp.dnamail.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD2B2113FD6 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:55:43 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.dnamail.fi 8AD2B2113FD6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=welho.com; s=2025-03; t=1781024143; bh=cSthxAoREQcZeQIlZEEg3zQYsB5XkxLdwGnFVfXxtrI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kHi61iHWaPMY5R7JptYPfpP3KOc91msyIh9lLxV+lKmmJARwMbsrOEeWbxSqq4jMo qIozcZjj4buMoOXXgXIG3wOe5GNpspq71594xE9UH7Fusk9WdsUdg7zFkLtDTLArqV Mw24xOdOyHPd6nZeiH4Oh5rnVboOvGF+fxKdkbiysrdgJm6HVEDS9d4wKCa9DL8FxO emb2FFzoiHAbJpSFZVDSc9NP9y2EiALg3rJStzfDuD3z202UevlmpcKQVBUt7MvfPH 9Lky82GstckjYV2DfqPnw+JBlEph8DmGbEHBGKxFeKoN2BJUyDi5BNPJFW9cDaQamN WqFSORBFxo/9w== Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:55:42 +0300 From: Ilari Liusvaara To: tls@ietf.org Message-ID: References: <178100161553.1166.17557928717720479639@dt-datatracker-56f887f959-hdgj4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com Message-ID-Hash: C76JUHCW4GMOOPM5YMMT2U4GQMZYKX5S X-Message-ID-Hash: C76JUHCW4GMOOPM5YMMT2U4GQMZYKX5S X-MailFrom: ilariliusvaara@welho.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTLS=5D_Re=3A_Fwd=3A_New_Version_Notification_for_draft-sheffer-?= =?utf-8?q?tls-pqc-continuity-02=2Etxt?= List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 02:09:09PM +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote: > This version addresses comments from an extensive discussion on this list, > as well as our learnings from a POC implementation [1]. AFAIK, Merkle Tree Certificates (PLANTS WG) do not have any indication in the certificate itself if those are post-quantum or not (nor does certificate properties from TAI have this information). This might be an issue for APs. > [1] https://github.com/yaronf/pqc-continuity-poc > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity-02.txt > Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:40:15 -0700 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > To: Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Tirumaleswar > Reddy , Yaron Sheffer > > > > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity-02.txt has > been successfully submitted by Yaron Sheffer and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity > Revision: 02 > Title: PQC Continuity: Downgrade Protection for TLS Servers Migrating to PQC > Date: 2026-06-09 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 14 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity-02.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity/ > HTML: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity-02.html > HTMLized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity-02 -Ilari