From nobody Sun Jun 13 00:39:30 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795C23A0D38 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:39:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=YG3OJ6JN; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FLT48kPk Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ryrFDoT2ZkA for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F093E3A0D35 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5939F10D9 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 03:39:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 03:39:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm3; bh=C4EWg/p3KXN nCSCmVKQ2XeMveJ/6StGaSTbTuIIEFXc=; b=YG3OJ6JNXaDkeqv1K6aAved3SyN tejs46T299h5JrMvI1+/9DT/+5Y13EYpws7Cq1mF7ilDs1B0LnMcMKMK3+rv/40G X4LJvlgI1W2NGqbI992gxJwZTgUHVwg/jez6TrSllRo2fbZfmHRj2HjsTP5vAdq+ 3BXo5pbcTZ6LpycanazuZ46rVGbcTrEKh+t7kYkU3cjNCmWI62+S6l3ieoMKTGmK pFBt5DH7w9qxL+f1NEGL09OHBOhaI2LEFLu1RpnumyIyizbEE7/hOQqFaFON63Dc oMZp6f1j6MGLBqEW0KXKNqRG+ZvlizSuqX43u8/SKDnpIsIyYTOzxxSstEQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=C4EWg/p3KXNnCSCmVKQ2XeMveJ/6StGaSTbTuIIEFXc=; b=FLT48kPk aM+IlYykWDxeR4WoUYabhiM188YON+9Kj4COEg+Itrd5nmTKgx0FzeRv7SAQEuXT 5fWP7ZW/msMdeso8clr+A3vsqV+yGxSEZmq/tUeYmzs+y/r6qPbwKwILHWU6Ywji tCqamlrvhbYd4kEZ3iKV37jXU8FE3rV9TU62ytoqwsCsNGtWVjGwJ2iSirffAcRW F+9zQjhsRFE0yb+NdVZNAZGwGbD1OtwZ7hLMObrktIJWXGxuV4TKLOHiOVVqNIHM YRrpkOmUOVVOlKnSssE2izQwm8e0yT3YnbgQiCNp1kTmt/irwnFfZCrPzhdKahsl i4rvkR6s+3KU8A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedvvddgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 03:39:19 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============3000706944066257042==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Repository Activity Summary Bot To: tls@ietf.org Message-Id: <20210613073921.F093E3A0D35@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts) X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 07:39:27 -0000 --===============3000706944066257042== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+5/-8/=F0=9F=92=AC16) 5 issues created: - Make the definition of key protocol elements easier to find (by martint= homson) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/454=20 - Provide a link to this repo in the draft (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/453=20 - Reserve some code points for GREASE (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/451=20 - Grease HRR acceptance signal? (by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/450=20 - Acceptance signal isn't pseudorandom (by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/448=20 7 issues received 16 new comments: - #453 Provide a link to this repo in the draft (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/453=20 - #450 Grease HRR acceptance signal? (6 by chris-wood, davidben, martinth= omson, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/450=20 - #448 Acceptance signal isn't pseudorandom (1 by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/448=20 - #441 Reconsider non-HRR ECH acceptance signal (1 by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/441=20 - #437 Example unsupported mandatory Configuration Extension (3 by davidb= en, sayrer) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/437 [editorial]=20 - #397 Including the client's ephemeral public key in the AAD precludes u= se of a single-shot HPKE API (3 by chris-wood, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/397 [design]=20 - #359 Transcript hash construction (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/359 [design]=20 8 issues closed: - Including the client's ephemeral public key in the AAD precludes use of= a single-shot HPKE API https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues= /397 [design]=20 - Transcript hash construction https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-es= ni/issues/359 [design]=20 - Example unsupported mandatory Configuration Extension https://github.co= m/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/437 [editorial]=20 - Acceptance signal may not be pseudorandom https://github.com/tlswg/draf= t-ietf-tls-esni/issues/448=20 - Provide a link to this repo in the draft https://github.com/tlswg/draft= -ietf-tls-esni/issues/453=20 - ECH contradicts second ClientHello consistency requirements in RFC8446 = https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/358 [design]=20 - Proposal: Introduce HelloRetryRequestOuter/Inner https://github.com/tls= wg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/374 [design]=20 - CHI vs. CHO when HRR is sent https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-es= ni/issues/373 [design]=20 * tlswg/dtls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC4) 1 issues created: - Should the protocol specify a mechanism to ensure that the link is disc= onnected if the peer is restarted or some reason? (by yangyangtiantianlongl= ong) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/248=20 1 issues received 4 new comments: - #248 Should the protocol specify a mechanism to ensure that the link is= disconnected if the peer is restarted or some reason? (4 by ekr, yangyangt= iantianlonglong) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/248=20 * tlswg/dtls-conn-id (+0/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC3) 3 issues received 3 new comments: - #109 John Scudder's IESG review (1 by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/109=20 - #107 Martin Duke's IESG review (1 by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/107=20 - #103 =C3=89ric Vyncke's IESG review (1 by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/103=20 Pull requests ------------- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+7/-7/=F0=9F=92=AC39) 7 pull requests submitted: - Define the Padding message (by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/457=20 - Require that someone validate public_name correctly. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/456=20 - Require compressed extensions appear in the same relative order. (by da= vidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/455=20 - Document the other ech_outer_extensions DoS vector. (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/452=20 - Accept conf hkdf (by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/449=20 - Leave IPv4 address parsing to the application (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/447=20 - Rephrase maximum_name_length description. (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/446=20 13 pull requests received 39 new comments: - #457 Define the Padding message (5 by cjpatton, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/457=20 - #455 Require compressed extensions appear in the same relative order. (= 4 by chris-wood, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/455=20 - #452 Document the other ech_outer_extensions DoS vector. (3 by chris-wo= od, davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/452=20 - #449 Make the acceptance signal pseudorandom (2 by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/449=20 - #447 Leave IPv4 address parsing to the application (1 by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/447=20 - #443 Move ClientHello padding to the encoding. (3 by chris-wood, davidb= en) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/443=20 - #442 Preserve length prefixes in ClientHelloOuterAAD (6 by cbartle891, = chris-wood, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/442=20 - #436 Prohibit IP addresses in ECHConfig.public_name. (8 by chris-wood, = davidben, richsalz, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/436=20 - #423 Confirm ECH acceptance after HRR (2 by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/423=20 - #422 Use ECH payload to distinguish CHI from CHO (2 by cjpatton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/422=20 - #417 HRR applies to both (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/417=20 - #416 Don't make a new handshake (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/416=20 - #313 Replace record-level padding with handshake-level padding (1 by cj= patton) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/313=20 7 pull requests merged: - Add some security considerations for cookie values. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/439=20 - Make the acceptance signal pseudorandom https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/449=20 - Use ECH payload to distinguish CHI from CHO https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/422=20 - Confirm ECH acceptance after HRR https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/423=20 - Preserve length prefixes in ClientHelloOuterAAD https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/442=20 - Rephrase maximum_name_length description. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/446=20 - Link to sections of references. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/445=20 * tlswg/dtls-conn-id (+4/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC6) 4 pull requests submitted: - update RRC ref (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/121=20 - Mention padding and ContentType encryption (by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/120=20 - clarify "replace the address" (by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/119=20 - fix section reference to RFC 8446 for presentation language (by kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/118=20 1 pull requests received 6 new comments: - #119 clarify "replace the address" (6 by boaks, ekr, kaduk) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/119=20 1 pull requests merged: - fix section reference to RFC 8446 for presentation language https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/118=20 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni * https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts * https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls * https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team --===============3000706944066257042== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Sunday June 13, 2021

Issues

tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+5/-8/=F0=9F=92=AC16)

5 issues created:

7 issues received 16 new comments:

8 issues closed:

tlswg/dtls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC4)

1 issues created:

1 issues received 4 new comments:

tlswg/dtls-conn-id (+0/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC3)

3 issues received 3 new comments:

Pull requests

tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+7/-7/=F0=9F=92=AC39)

7 pull requests submitted:

13 pull requests received 39 new comments:

7 pull requests merged:

tlswg/dtls-conn-id (+4/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC6)

4 pull requests submitted:

1 pull requests received 6 new comments:

1 pull requests merged:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============3000706944066257042==--