IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858571A8779 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 04:12:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwqfn9-7pG2O for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 04:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway04.websitewelcome.com (gateway04.websitewelcome.com [69.93.164.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64F61A8774 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 04:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gateway04.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 00F6736345292; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:12:37 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway04.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A7A36345236 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:12:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [96.231.221.128] (port=50355 helo=[192.168.1.7]) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1YO3Ua-0008T4-AT; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:12:36 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F4C76ED-4375-438F-ADC9-66E49A19574B@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:12:33 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3D28DD5-8C07-43AC-8DA8-577FA11441E3@ieca.com>
References: <3F4C76ED-4375-438F-ADC9-66E49A19574B@ieca.com>
To: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 96.231.221.128
X-Exim-ID: 1YO3Ua-0008T4-AT
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.1.7]) [96.231.221.128]:50355
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VfO7CFwWgsl3yQWhv_rsEhSbDi8>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:12:39 -0000

On Jan 23, 2015, at 14:30, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:

> This is the WGLC (working group last call) for draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05/
> Please send comments on this draft to the TLS list before February 16, 2015.
> 
> The chairs and our AD are curious about whether switching to use of “e” as opposed to “pi”, as RFC 3526 did, is an issue.  The draft provides rationale for the change, but Stephen asked about this particular point @ our Hawaii session.
> 
> spt

All,

The WGLC has concluded.  dkg noted he’d received some comments off-list and Watson provide some input.  We’ll need a new version to review the changes to see if it should be progressed or whether another WGLC is needed.  I’ve updated the datatracker to reflect the new state.

dkg,

Any chance of another version before the 2015-03-09 draft submission deadline?

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email